Literature DB >> 12452942

Arthritis treatment in Hong Kong--cost analysis of celecoxib versus conventional NSAIDS, with or without gastroprotective agents.

J H S You1, K K C Lee, T Y K Chan, W H Lau, F K L Chan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors have been reported to cause fewer gastrointestinal complications when compared with conventional, non-selective, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). AIM: To analyse the cost of celecoxib (selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor) and conventional NSAID regimens for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis from the perspective of a public health organization in Hong Kong.
METHODS: A decision tree was used to analyse the cost of celecoxib, NSAID alone, NSAID plus histamine2-receptor antagonist, NSAID plus misoprostol and NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor over 6 months. Model outcomes were no gastrointestinal toxicity, gastrointestinal discomfort, symptomatic ulcer, anaemia with occult bleeding and serious gastrointestinal complications. The clinical probabilities were estimated from clinical trials. Resource utilization for gastrointestinal events was determined locally. Sensitivity analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The 6-month costs per base-case analysis were as follows: NSAID plus histamine2-receptor antagonist, 1404 HK dollars (1 US dollar = 7.8 HK dollars); celecoxib, 1545 HK dollars; NSAID alone, 1610 HK dollars; NSAID plus misoprostol, 2213 HK dollars; NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor, 2857 HK dollars. The model was sensitive to the patients' underlying gastrointestinal risk scores, daily cost of NSAID regimen, risk ratio of NSAID plus histamine2-receptor antagonist for symptomatic ulcer, daily cost of celecoxib and daily cost of histamine2-receptor antagonist.
CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib appeared to be the least costly alternative in patients with intermediate to high gastrointestinal risk for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in Hong Kong.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452942     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01376.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Comprehensive Review of Celecoxib Oral Solution for the Acute Treatment of Migraine.

Authors:  Nazir Noor; Courtney LaChute; Mathew Root; Jasmine Rogers; Madeleine Richard; Giustino Varrassi; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; Nazih Khater; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  A comparison of cost effectiveness using data from randomized trials or actual clinical practice: selective cox-2 inhibitors as an example.

Authors:  Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa; Hubert G Leufkens; Bill Zhang; Liam Smeeth
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 3.  Comparison of gastrointestinal adverse effects between cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and non-selective, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saharat Jarupongprapa; Prapassorn Ussavasodhi; Wanruchada Katchamart
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  The cost-effectiveness of celecoxib versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus proton-pump inhibitors in the treatment of osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sherif A Nasef; A Aziz Shaaban; Joaquin Mould-Quevedo; Tarek A Ismail
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 5.  Treatment costs to prevent or treat upper gastrointestinal adverse events associated with NSAIDs.

Authors:  Elham Rahme; Alan N Barkun; Viviane Adam; Marc Bardou
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.228

6.  An economic model of long-term use of celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Michael Loyd; Dale Rublee; Philip Jacobs
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.