Literature DB >> 12452638

Comparison of the nutritional profile of glyphosate-tolerant corn event NK603 with that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.).

William P Ridley1, Ravinder S Sidhu, Paul D Pyla, Margaret A Nemeth, Matthew L Breeze, James D Astwood.   

Abstract

The composition of glyphosate-tolerant (Roundup Ready) corn event NK603 was compared with that of conventional corn grown in the United States in 1998 and in the European Union in 1999 to assess compositional equivalence. Grain and forage samples were collected from both replicated and nonreplicated field trials, and compositional analyses were performed to measure proximates, fiber, amino acids, fatty acids, vitamin E, nine minerals, phytic acid, trypsin inhibitor, and secondary metabolites in grain as well as proximates and fiber in forage. Statistical analysis of the data was conducted to assess statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level. The values for all of the biochemical components assessed for corn event NK603 were similar to those of the nontransgenic control or were within the published range observed for nontransgenic commercial corn hybrids. In addition, the compositional profile of Roundup Ready corn event NK603 was compared with that of traditional corn hybrids grown in Europe by calculating a 99% tolerance interval to describe compositional variability in the population of traditional corn varieties in the marketplace. These comparisons, together with the history of the safe use of corn as a common component of animal feed and human food, support the conclusion that Roundup Ready corn event NK603 is compositionally equivalent to, and as safe and nutritious as, conventional corn hybrids grown commercially today.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452638     DOI: 10.1021/jf0205662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  12 in total

1.  A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties.

Authors:  Hilko van der Voet; Joe N Perry; Billy Amzal; Claudia Paoletti
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.563

2.  Characterization of GMO or glyphosate effects on the composition of maize grain and maize-based diet for rat feeding.

Authors:  Stéphane Bernillon; Mickaël Maucourt; Catherine Deborde; Sylvain Chéreau; Daniel Jacob; Nathalie Priymenko; Bérengère Laporte; Xavier Coumoul; Bernard Salles; Peter M Rogowsky; Florence Richard-Forget; Annick Moing
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011.

Authors:  Keith J Ward; Margaret A Nemeth; Cavell Brownie; Bonnie Hong; Rod A Herman; Regina Oberdoerfer
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 4.  Glyphosate effects on plant mineral nutrition, crop rhizosphere microbiota, and plant disease in glyphosate-resistant crops.

Authors:  Stephen O Duke; John Lydon; William C Koskinen; Thomas B Moorman; Rufus L Chaney; Raymond Hammerschmidt
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Marco P Candolfi; Keri Carstens; Adinda De Schrijver; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Rod A Herman; Joseph E Huesing; Morven A McLean; Alan Raybould; Anthony M Shelton; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing.

Authors:  Keri Carstens; Jennifer Anderson; Pamela Bachman; Adinda De Schrijver; Galen Dively; Brian Federici; Mick Hamer; Marco Gielkens; Peter Jensen; William Lamp; Stefan Rauschen; Geoff Ridley; Jörg Romeis; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 7.  Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants.

Authors:  Robert Heyer; Fabian Kohrs; Udo Reichl; Dirk Benndorf
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Insect-protected event DAS-81419-2 soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in the United States and Brazil is compositionally equivalent to nontransgenic soybean.

Authors:  Brandon J Fast; Ariane C Schafer; Tempest Y Johnson; Brian L Potts; Rod A Herman
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 9.  Prospecting for Microelement Function and Biosafety Assessment of Transgenic Cereal Plants.

Authors:  Xiaofen Yu; Qingchen Luo; Kaixun Huang; Guangxiao Yang; Guangyuan He
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Safe composition levels of transgenic crops assessed via a clinical medicine model.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Peter N Scherer; Amy M Phillips; Nicholas P Storer; Mark Krieger
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.