Literature DB >> 12452271

Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right.

Angelique A Scharine1, Michael K McBeath.   

Abstract

We tested a finding by E. S. Robinson (1933) that people have a bias to turn right upon entering a building. We hypothesized that this bias is attributable to learning derived from traffic rules that specify driving on the right side of the road and that it also could be related to handedness. We tested participants in both the United States and England in a simple "T-maze" task in order to compare their directional preference. Handedness was the best predictor of participants' directional preference. However, U.S. participants also were statistically more likely to turn right than were English participants. The preference to turn right was not found to be significantly related to eye dominance or reading direction of the primary written language of the participant, although in the case of reading direction, the sample size of right-to-left readers was too small to be conclusive. The findings support that walking direction preference is an additive function of both learned driving patterns and genetic handedness. These findings have practical implications for the design of public spaces such as schools, businesses, and urban centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452271     DOI: 10.1518/0018720024497916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  13 in total

1.  North is up(hill): route planning heuristics in real-world environments.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Caroline R Mahoney; Aaron L Gardony; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Single-destination navigation in a multiple-destination environment: a new "later-destination attractor" bias in route choice.

Authors:  En Fu; Mary Bravo; Beverly Roskos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

4.  Embodied Information in Cognitive Tasks: Haptic Weight Sensations Affect Task Performance and Processing Style.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Alina Vennekötter
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  The right way to kiss: directionality bias in head-turning during kissing.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Chhanda Karmaker; Arifa Rahman; Fahria Karim; Naima Nigar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Where Are the Months? Mental Images of Circular Time in a Large Online Sample.

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Anders Hofseth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-28

7.  Rotational preference in gymnastics.

Authors:  Thomas Heinen; Damian Jeraj; Pia M Vinken; Konstantinos Velentzas
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  Take your seats: leftward asymmetry in classroom seating choice.

Authors:  Victoria L Harms; Lisa J O Poon; Austen K Smith; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Navigating to new frontiers in behavioral neuroscience: traditional neuropsychological tests predict human performance on a rodent-inspired radial-arm maze.

Authors:  Sarah E Mennenga; Leslie C Baxter; Itamar S Grunfeld; Gene A Brewer; Leona S Aiken; Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi; Bryan W Camp; Jazmin I Acosta; B Blair Braden; Keley R Schaefer; Julia E Gerson; Courtney N Lavery; Candy W S Tsang; Lauren T Hewitt; Melissa L Kingston; Stephanie V Koebele; K Jakob Patten; B Hunter Ball; Michael K McBeath; Heather A Bimonte-Nelson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Main factor causing "faster-is-slower" phenomenon during evacuation: rodent experiment and simulation.

Authors:  Hyejin Oh; Junyoung Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.