Literature DB >> 12450596

Direct coronary stenting versus predilatation followed by stent placement.

Martin Brueck1, Dierk Scheinert, Alois Wortmann, Jens Bremer, Hubertus von Korn, Lutz Klinghammer, Wilfried Kramer, Frank A Flachskampf, Werner G Daniel, Josef Ludwig.   

Abstract

Direct stenting without antecedent dilatation may reduce procedural time, costs, and radiation exposure, and may result in less vessel injury. The purpose of this investigation was to compare immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of direct stenting with stent placement after initial balloon dilation. Three hundred thirty-five symptomatic patients with single or multiple coronary lesions (diameter reduction 60% to 95%) of < or =30 mm length and with a vessel diameter of 2.5 to 4.0 mm were randomized either to direct stenting (group A, n = 171) or stenting after predilation (group B, n = 164). Patients with vessels with excessive calcification, severe proximal tortuosity, or occlusion were excluded. All patients were asked to return for routine repeat angiography at 6 months, irrespective of symptoms. Feasibility of direct stenting was 95% in group A, with 5% requiring crossover to predilation. Successful stent placement after predilation was performed in all 164 patients in group B. Direct stenting was associated with less procedural duration (group A 42.1 +/- 18.7 minutes vs group B 51.5 +/- 23.8 minutes, p = 0.004), radiation exposure time (group A 10.3 +/- 7.7 minutes vs group B 12.5 +/- 6.4 minutes, p = 0.002), amount of contrast dye used (group A 163 +/- 69 ml vs group B 197 +/- 84 ml, p <0.0001), and lower procedural costs (group A 845 +/- 167 vs group B 1,064 +/- 175, p <0.0001). Immediate angiographic results and in-hospital clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) were not significantly different between both strategies. However, at 6-month follow-up, direct stenting was associated with a lower angiographic restenosis (group A 20% vs group B 31%, p = 0.048) and target lesion revascularization rates (group A 18% vs group B 28%; p = 0.03). This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of direct stenting in eligible coronary lesions. In appropriately selected cases, direct stenting has a lower rate of angiographic restenosis up to 6 months after the procedure, resulting in fewer coronary reinterventions compared with the conventional strategy of stenting with antecedent dilatation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12450596     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02832-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Managing a complication after direct stenting: removal of a maldeployed stent with rotational atherectomy.

Authors:  M Herzum; R Cosmeleata; B Maisch
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  In-hospital and mid-term adverse clinical outcomes of a direct stenting strategy versus stenting after pre-dilatation for the treatment of coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  M Alidoosti; M Salarifar; S E Kassaian; A M Zeinali; M S Fathollahi; M R Dehkordi
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.167

3.  Deflated Balloon-Facilitated Direct Stenting in Primary Angioplasty (The DBDS Technique): A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Bhupendra Verma; Amrita Singh; Ashwani K Saxena; Manu Kumar
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2018-10-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.