Literature DB >> 12450472

Teaching Bayesian reasoning: an evaluation of a classroom tutorial for medical students.

Stephanie Kurzenhäuser1, Ulrich Hoffrage.   

Abstract

How likely is a diagnosis, given a particular medical test result? This probability can be determined by using Bayes's rule; however, previous research has shown that doctors often experience problems with Bayesian inferences. These findings illustrate the need to teach statistical reasoning in medical education. A new method of teaching Bayesian reasoning is representation learning: the key idea is to instruct medical students how to translate probability information into a representation that is easier to process, namely natural frequencies. This approach was implemented in a one-hour classroom tutorial to evaluate its effectiveness in this setting and compared with a traditional rule-learning approach. Evaluation took place two months after training by testing students' ability to correctly solve a Bayesian inference task with information represented as probabilities. While both approaches improved performance, almost three times as many students were able to profit from representation training as opposed to rule training.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12450472     DOI: 10.1080/0142159021000012540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  11 in total

1.  Does prevalence matter to physicians in estimating post-test probability of disease? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Thomas Agoritsas; Delphine S Courvoisier; Christophe Combescure; Marie Deom; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Appraising and applying evidence about a diagnostic test during a performance-based assessment.

Authors:  George Bergus; Scott Vogelgesang; Janeta Tansey; Ellen Franklin; Ronald Feld
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Presentation of Diagnostic Information to Doctors May Change Their Interpretation and Clinical Management: A Web-Based Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Simon M Collin; James Quekett; Jonathan A C Sterne; Penny Whiting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Chances and risks in medical risk communication.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoffrage; Michael Koller
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-09

5.  Instruction in information structuring improves Bayesian judgment in intelligence analysts.

Authors:  David R Mandel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-08

6.  Repeated testing improves achievement in a blended learning approach for risk competence training of medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Spreckelsen; J Juenger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Explaining computation of predictive values: 2 x 2 table versus frequency tree. A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN74278823].

Authors:  Anke Steckelberg; Andrea Balgenorth; Jürgen Berger; Ingrid Mühlhauser
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Edward T Cokely; Ulrich Hoffrage
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-16

9.  Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoffrage; Stefan Krauss; Laura Martignon; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-14

10.  Natural frequencies facilitate diagnostic inferences of managers.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoffrage; Sebastian Hafenbrädl; Cyril Bouquet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.