Literature DB >> 12450469

Small-group work and assessment in a PBL curriculum: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of student perceptions of the process of working in small groups and its assessment.

S C Willis1, A Jones, C Bundy, K Burdett, C R Whitehouse, P A O'Neill.   

Abstract

The problem based learning (PBL) curriculum at Manchester emphasizes small-group work. This is supported through group assessment where students assess key aspects of their group's function. In the study described here the authors evaluated students' perceptions of both PBL group work and what a group assessment needs to assess. They aimed to produce a description of the cognitive and motivational influences on group process and unpack the ways they contribute to a successful PBL group so that the kinds of skills an effective assessment should assess could be identified. Focus groups and a questionnaire were used to generate the data. The focus group results indicate that students support PBL group work as a method of learning, and that those groups that work cooperatively are perceived as facilitating the most motivating learning environment. The students supported the assessment being summative and felt that it could be simplified to measure: behavioural skills contributing to maximizing motivation of the group process; and cognitive skills relating to the content of the group discussion. The questionnaire results also supported the use of a summative assessment of small-group work that evaluates the domains of group process and the content of the group discussion.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12450469     DOI: 10.1080/0142159021000012531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  11 in total

1.  [Evaluation of traditional German undergraduate surgical training. An analysis at Heidelberg University].

Authors:  S Schürer; D Schellberg; J Schmidt; F Kallinowski; A Mehrabi; Ch Herfarth; M W Büchler; M Kadmon
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Perceptions of Australian and Malaysian Educators in an Undergraduate Pharmacy Program on Case-based Learning.

Authors:  Sabrina Anne Jacob; Ong Hui Dhing; Daniel Malone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Small group discussions as an effective teaching-learning methodology for learning the principles of family medicine among 2nd-year MBBS students.

Authors:  M Roshni; A Rahim
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-05-31

4.  Students and tutors' social representations of assessment in problem-based learning tutorials supporting change.

Authors:  Valdes R Bollela; Manoel H C Gabarra; Caetano da Costa; Rita C P Lima
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Elective anatomy by whole body dissection course: what motivates students?

Authors:  Annette Burgess; George Ramsey-Stewart
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Role modelling of clinical tutors: a focus group study among medical students.

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Kerry Goulston; Kim Oates
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Self- and peer assessment may not be an accurate measure of PBL tutorial process.

Authors:  José Lúcio Martins Machado; Valéria Menezes Peixeiro Machado; Waldir Grec; Valdes Roberto Bollela; Joaquim Edson Vieira
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Engaging students and faculty: implications of self-determination theory for teachers and leaders in academic medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lyness; Stephen J Lurie; Denham S Ward; Christopher J Mooney; David R Lambert
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  The perceived effects of faculty presence vs. absence on small-group learning and group dynamics: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Miriam Hoffman; Joanne E Wilkinson; Jin Xu; John Wiecha
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees.

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Tim Dornan; Antonia J Clarke; Audrey Menezes; Craig Mellis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.