Literature DB >> 12448996

Location and sampling of aqueous and hydrothermal deposits in martian impact craters.

H E Newsom1, J J Hagerty, I E Thorsos.   

Abstract

Do large craters on Mars represent sites that contain aqueous and hydrothermal deposits that provide clues to astrobiological processes? Are these materials available for sampling in large craters? Several lines of evidence strongly support the exploration of large impact craters to study deposits important for astrobiology. The great depth of impact craters, up to several kilometers relative to the surrounding terrain, can allow the breaching of local aquifers, providing a source of water for lakes and hydrothermal systems. Craters can also be filled with water from outflow channels and valley networks to form large lakes with accompanying sedimentation. Impact melt and uplifted basement heat sources in craters > 50 km in diameter should be sufficient to drive substantial hydrothermal activity and keep crater lakes from freezing for thousands of years, even under cold climatic conditions. Fluid flow in hydrothermal systems is focused at the edges of large planar impact melt sheets, suggesting that the edge of the melt sheets will have experienced substantial hydrothermal alteration and mineral deposition. Hydrothermal deposits, fine-grained lacustrine sediments, and playa evaporite deposits may preserve evidence for biogeochemical processes that occurred in the aquifers and craters. Therefore, large craters may represent giant Petri dishes for culturing preexisting life on Mars and promoting biogeochemical processes. Landing sites must be identified in craters where access to the buried lacustrine sediments and impact melt deposits is provided by processes such as erosion from outflow channels, faulting, aeolian erosion, or excavation by later superimposed cratering events. Very recent gully formation and small impacts within craters may allow surface sampling of organic materials exposed only recently to the harsh oxidizing surface environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12448996     DOI: 10.1089/153110701750137459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Astrobiology        ISSN: 1557-8070            Impact factor:   4.335


  4 in total

1.  Methane Seepage on Mars: Where to Look and Why.

Authors:  Dorothy Z Oehler; Giuseppe Etiope
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Bacterial communities and the nitrogen cycle in the gypsum soils of Cuatro Ciénegas Basin, coahuila: a Mars analogue.

Authors:  Nguyen E López-Lozano; Luis E Eguiarte; Germán Bonilla-Rosso; Felipe García-Oliva; Celeste Martínez-Piedragil; Christine Rooks; Valeria Souza
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Earth's Impact Events Through Geologic Time: A List of Recommended Ages for Terrestrial Impact Structures and Deposits.

Authors:  Martin Schmieder; David A Kring
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Probing the hydrothermal system of the Chicxulub impact crater.

Authors:  David A Kring; Sonia M Tikoo; Martin Schmieder; Ulrich Riller; Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra; Sarah L Simpson; Gordon R Osinski; Jérôme Gattacceca; Axel Wittmann; Christina M Verhagen; Charles S Cockell; Marco J L Coolen; Fred J Longstaffe; Sean P S Gulick; Joanna V Morgan; Timothy J Bralower; Elise Chenot; Gail L Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Ludovic Ferrière; Catalina Gebhardt; Kazuhisa Goto; Sophie L Green; Heather Jones; Johanna Lofi; Christopher M Lowery; Rubén Ocampo-Torres; Ligia Perez-Cruz; Annemarie E Pickersgill; Michael H Poelchau; Auriol S P Rae; Cornelia Rasmussen; Honami Sato; Jan Smit; Naotaka Tomioka; Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi; Michael T Whalen; Long Xiao; Kosei E Yamaguchi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 14.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.