Literature DB >> 12448731

The significance of inter- and intraspecific variation in bacterivorous and herbivorous protists.

Thomas Weisse1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the emerging evidence on the significance of inter- and intraspecific variation in the feeding behaviour of aquatic protists. Small heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) have been identified as the primary bacterial consumers in most aquatic environments. Recent research using novel techniques such as flow cytometry and high resolution video microscopy revealed that their feeding strategies and grazing rates are diverse. There is an important conceptual difference between uptake rates measured in short-term (min to h) experiments and grazing rates averaged over a longer-term (d). This is because the latter are strongly affected by digestion rates which are species-specific, i.e. the same bacterial prey may be digested differently by various grazers, and the same predator may selectively digest variable prey. Planktonic ciliates are the most important algal consumers in many lakes and marine systems. Large species-specific differences in their feeding behaviour and growth rates have been documented for closely related species. Intraspecific variation, which is, most likely, caused by varying clonal composition may be as important as interspecific variation. Finally, there is some evidence that the individual variability within a given population is generally large, both among bacterivorous HNF and among herbivorous ciliates. The consequences of this diversity becoming apparent at the levels of the species, population, clone and individual need to be considered by aquatic ecologists in their conceptual models.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12448731     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020547517255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek        ISSN: 0003-6072            Impact factor:   2.271


  8 in total

1.  Ecotypes of planktonic actinobacteria with identical 16S rRNA genes adapted to thermal niches in temperate, subtropical, and tropical freshwater habitats.

Authors:  Martin W Hahn; Matthias Pöckl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The extent of protist diversity: insights from molecular ecology of freshwater eukaryotes.

Authors:  Jan Slapeta; David Moreira; Purificación López-García
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited.

Authors:  Michael Bonkowski
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Protistan grazing analysis by flow cytometry using prey labeled by in vivo expression of fluorescent proteins.

Authors:  Yutao Fu; Charles O'Kelly; Michael Sieracki; Daniel L Distel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The effect of external flow on the feeding currents of sessile microorganisms.

Authors:  Rachel E Pepper; Emily E Riley; Matthieu Baron; Thomas Hurot; Lasse Tor Nielsen; M A R Koehl; Thomas Kiørboe; Anders Andersen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Systematics and species-specific response to pH of Oxytricha acidotolerans sp. nov. and Urosomoida sp. (Ciliophora, Hypotricha) from acid mining lakes.

Authors:  Thomas Weisse; Michael Moser; Ulrike Scheffel; Peter Stadler; Thomas Berendonk; Guntram Weithoff; Helmut Berger
Journal:  Eur J Protistol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Cryptophyta as major bacterivores in freshwater summer plankton.

Authors:  Vesna Grujcic; Julia K Nuy; Michaela M Salcher; Tanja Shabarova; Vojtech Kasalicky; Jens Boenigk; Manfred Jensen; Karel Simek
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Protist-Bacteria Associations: Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria Are Prevalent as Digestion-Resistant Bacteria in Ciliated Protozoa.

Authors:  Jun Gong; Yao Qing; Songbao Zou; Rao Fu; Lei Su; Xiaoli Zhang; Qianqian Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.