Literature DB >> 12448672

Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically.

Sheila Hawker1, Sheila Payne, Christine Kerr, Michael Hardey, Jackie Powell.   

Abstract

The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data andacross disciplines.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12448672     DOI: 10.1177/1049732302238251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  188 in total

Review 1.  Developing methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: an example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 1. Identifying the literature.

Authors:  Rosalind McNally; Alison Alborz
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2004-09

2.  Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?

Authors:  David Ogilvie; Matt Egan; Val Hamilton; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?

Authors:  David Ogilvie; Val Hamilton; Matt Egan; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Low-income mothers, nutrition and health: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Pamela Attree
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Julie Barroso; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Clinical utility of predictors of return-to-work outcome following work-related musculoskeletal injury.

Authors:  Heidi Muenchberger; Elizabeth Kendall; Peter Grimbeek; Travis Gee
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-11-30

8.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Res Sch       Date:  2006

9.  A Systematic Review of Cognitive Outcomes in Angiographically Negative Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.

Authors:  Tom Burke; Stephanie Hughes; Alan Carr; Mohsen Javadpour; Niall Pender
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Mapping the Mixed Methods-Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Jennifer Leeman; Jamie L Crandell
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2011-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.