Literature DB >> 12448409

Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India.

K S Rao1, R K Maikhuri, S Nautiyal, K G Saxena.   

Abstract

The success of conserving biological resources in any Biosphere Reserve or protected area depends on the extent of support and positive attitudes and perceptions of local people have towards such establishments. Ignoring the dependence of the local people for their subsistence needs on resources of such areas leads to conflicts between protected area managers and the local inhabitants. Crop yield losses and livestock depredation were serious problems observed in most buffer zone villages of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. In the present study 10 villages situated in the buffer zone of Nanada Devi Biosphere Reserve (1612 km2 area) in Chamoli district of Uttaranchal, India were studied during 1996-97 using a questionnaire survey of each household (419 = households; 2253 = total population in 1991; 273 ha = cultivated area). Estimates of crop yield losses were made using paired plots technique in four representative villages for each crop species. The magnitude of crop yield losses varied significantly with the distance of agricultural field from forest boundary. The total crop yield losses were high for wheat and potato in all the villages. The spatial distribution of total crop yield losses in any village indicated that they were highest in the area near to forest and least in the area near to village for all crops. Losses from areas near to forest contributed to more than 50% of total losses for each crop in all villages. However, in Lata, Peng and Tolma villages, the losses are high for kidney bean and chemmi (local variety of kidney bean) which varied between 18.5% to 30% of total losses in those villages. Potato alone represents 43.6% of total crop yield loss due to wildlife in Dronagiri village in monetary terms. Among the crops, the monetary value of yield losses are least for amaranth and highest for kidney bean. The projected total value of crop yield losses due to wildlife damage for buffer zone villages located in Garhwal Himalaya is about Rs. 538,620 (US$ 15,389). Besides food grains, horticultural crops i.e. apple, also suffered maximum damage. Major wildlife agents responsible for crop damage were wild boar, bear, porcupine, monkey, musk deer and partridge (chokor). Monkey and wild boar alone accounted for about 50% to 60% of total crop damage in the study villages. Goat and sheep are the major livestock killed by leopard. The total value of livestock losses at prevailing market rates is about Rs. 1,024,520 (US$ 29,272) in the study villages. Due to existing conservation policies and laxity in implementation of preventive measures, the problems for local inhabitants are increasing. Potential solutions discussed emphasize the need to undertake suitable and appropriate protective measures to minimize the crop losses. Change in cropping and crop composition, particularly cultivation of medicinal plants (high value low volume crops), were also suggested. Besides, fair and quick disbursement of compensation for crop loss and livestock killing need to be adopted. Local people of the buffer zone area already have a negative attitude towards park/reserve establishment due to socio-political changes inducing major economic losses and this attitude may lead to clashes and confrontations if proper ameliorative measures are not taken immediately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12448409     DOI: 10.1006/jema.2002.0587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

Review 1.  Compensation payments for downsides generated by protected areas.

Authors:  Peter Pechacek; Guo Li; Junsheng Li; Wei Wang; Xiaopu Wu; Jing Xu
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  The monkey is not always a God: Attitudinal differences toward crop-raiding macaques and why it matters for conflict mitigation.

Authors:  Shaurabh Anand; Vilakkathala Vijayan Binoy; Sindhu Radhakrishna
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation.

Authors:  S A Dhenge; S N Ghadge; M C Ahire; S D Gorantiwar; M G Shinde
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.080

4.  Coincidence of low genetic diversity and increasing population size in wild gaur populations in the Khao Phaeng Ma Non-Hunting Area, Thailand: A challenge for conservation management under human-wildlife conflict.

Authors:  Prateep Duengkae; Nattakan Ariyaraphong; Wanlaya Tipkantha; Waleemas Jairak; Sudarath Baicharoen; Dung Ho My Nguyen; Onjira Korboon; Worapong Singchat; Thitipong Panthum; Syed Farhan Ahmad; Erngsiri Kaewkhunjob; Chavin Chaisonkhram; Umaporn Maikaew; Narongrit Muangmai; Gittiyaporn Ieamsaard; Supaphen Sripiboon; Paanwaris Paansri; Warong Suksavate; Aingorn Chaiyes; Supagit Winitpornsawan; Umphornpimon Prayoon; Thiti Sornsa; Ratchanee Chokcharoen; Annop Buanual; Boripat Siriaroonrat; Yongchai Utara; Kornsorn Srikulnath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  The rhesus macaque as a success story of the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Eve B Cooper; Lauren J N Brent; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Mewa Singh; Asmita Sengupta; Sunil Khatiwada; Suchinda Malaivijitnond; Zhou Qi Hai; James P Higham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 6.  Reconciling farming and wild nature: Integrating human-wildlife coexistence into the land-sharing and land-sparing framework.

Authors:  Silvio J Crespin; Javier A Simonetti
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Farm crops depredation by European bison (Bison bonasus) in the vicinity of forest habitats in northeastern Poland.

Authors:  Emilia Hofman-Kamińska; Rafał Kowalczyk
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.266

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.