Literature DB >> 12448401

Measures of the EU Agri-Environmental Protection Scheme (GAEPS) and their impacts on the visual acceptability of Finnish agricultural landscapes.

Liisa Tahvanainen1, Marjut Ihalainen, Reija Hietala-Koivu, Osmo Kolehmainen, Liisa Tyrväinen, Ismo Nousiainen, Juha Helenius.   

Abstract

As a member of the European Union, Finland has committed itself to creating an environmental policy for agriculture. The aims of this study were to evaluate visual impacts of the General Agri-Environmental Protection Scheme (GAEPS) and Supplementary Protection Scheme (SPS) and general attitudes towards some activities in those policies and furthermore to examine the suitability of the method of Alho et al. (2001) for the scenic beauty assessment. The study areas consisted of three original, untreated, and 15 modified rural landscapes representing a variety of different activities. The scenic beauty of the landscapes was evaluated through pairwise comparisons of the responses of 68 people. Furthermore, attitudes towards environmental values, water protection, buffer strips and subsidies to agriculture were obtained. The respondents found the maintained buffer strips more pleasing than unmaintained strips and considered that the quality of watercourses was increased by buffer strips along them. A suitable width for the buffer strip along main ditches, brooks and waterways was regarded, on average, to be wider than the current recommendations. Although the opinions of farmers were basically in line with the existing recommendations, farmers' opininons on the second and third most important effects of buffer strips, an increase in weeds and a decrease in cultivated land, clearly differed from those of the other respondents. Afforestation, lack of building maintenance and abandoned fields were considered to be the most important factors impacting rural landscapes. This study indicates that the Finnish Agri-Environmental Protection Schemes have had positive impacts on the visual quality of landscapes. Attitudes towards other impacts are contradictory. This study also showed the improvement of the Alho et al. (2001) method in these kinds of studies relative to other methods of pairwise comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12448401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  Managing abandoned farmland: the need to link biological and sociological aspects.

Authors:  Karyne Benjamin; André Bouchard; Gérald Domon
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method.

Authors:  Zohre Bulut; Hasan Yilmaz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey).

Authors:  Zohre Bulut; Hasan Yilmaz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Studies on agri-environmental measures: a survey of the literature.

Authors:  Sandra Uthes; Bettina Matzdorf
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Assessing the visual quality of green landscaping in rural residential areas: the case of Changzhou, China.

Authors:  Yumin Yao; Xiaodong Zhu; Yingbi Xu; Haiyan Yang; Xian Wu; Yangfan Li; Yanfeng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Farmers' Preferences for Future Agricultural Land Use Under the Consideration of Climate Change.

Authors:  Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider; Nina M Mostegl; Julia Kelemen-Finan; Wolfgang Haider; Herbert Formayer; Jochen Kantelhardt; Tobias Moser; Martin Kapfer; Ryan Trenholm
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.266

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.