Literature DB >> 12447952

Cefepime or carbapenem treatment for febrile neutropenia as a single agent is as effective as a combination of 4th-generation cephalosporin + aminoglycosides: comparative study.

K Tamura1, H Matsuoka, J Tsukada, M Masuda, S Ikeda, E Matsuishi, F Kawano, Y Izumi, N Uike, A Utsunomiya, Y Saburi, T Shibuya, Y Imamura, S Hanada, S Okamura, H Gondoh.   

Abstract

1998, a consensus meeting was held in Miyazaki, Japan, to develop an approach to management of febrile neutropenia (FN). The K-HOT study group decided to examine whether this proposal was applicable to clinical practice in a multicenter study. Patients who developed fever with neutrophil counts <1,000/microL were randomized to receive either a single antibiotic, cefepime or one of the carbapenems, or a combination of cefepime and an aminoglycoside. Patients who became afebrile within the first 3 days were continued on the same treatment. Patients who remained febrile were switched to a combination regimen if they were randomized to receive a single agent, and patients on combination medication were changed from cefepime to another cephalosporin. A total of 165 patients were entered into the trial. One hundred fifty-three patients were evaluable for response. The average age was 52 years, and 70% of the patients had acute leukemia. Severe neutropenia, defined as <100/microL at the time of FN, was seen in 62% of the patients on entry and during the course of treatment 71% of patients experienced neutrophil counts of <100/microL. Microbiologically documented infection was seen in 6.5% for monotherapy, and 10.5% for a combination treatment, and fever of unknown origin occurred in 75.3% and 59.2% of the patients in each regimen, respectively. Excellent to good response was seen in two-thirds of the patients in all treatment groups. Adverse events were minimal, and three early deaths were observed at days 9, 16, and 16 among patients treated with a single antibiotic and three in the combination regimen group at days 14, 15, and 20. These results indicate that cefepime or a carbapenem alone is as effective as a combination of cefepime and an aminoglycoside for treating FN. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447952     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.10236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  10 in total

1.  Detection of bacteria in blood circulation in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Akiko Ota; Sachi Morita; Ayumu Matsuoka; Tomoya Shimokata; Osamu Maeda; Ayako Mitsuma; Tetsuya Yagi; Takashi Asahara; Yuichi Ando
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia.

Authors:  Diana Averbuch; Christina Orasch; Catherine Cordonnier; David M Livermore; Malgorzata Mikulska; Claudio Viscoli; Inge C Gyssens; Winfried V Kern; Galina Klyasova; Oscar Marchetti; Dan Engelhard; Murat Akova
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Targeted therapy against multi-resistant bacteria in leukemic and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-4, 2011).

Authors:  Diana Averbuch; Catherine Cordonnier; David M Livermore; Malgorzata Mikulska; Christina Orasch; Claudio Viscoli; Inge C Gyssens; Winfried V Kern; Galina Klyasova; Oscar Marchetti; Dan Engelhard; Murat Akova
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Cefepime vs. cefoperazone/sulbactam in combination with amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  M Ponraj; Biswajit Dubashi; B H Harish; S Kayal; S L Cyriac; Jogamaya Pattnaik; K Ranjith; Unni S Pillai; Naresh Jadhav; Kiran K Matta; Jagdeep Singh; Esha Jaffa; Bhanu Prakash
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Carbapenems versus other beta-lactams in treating severe infections in intensive care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S J Edwards; M J Clarke; S Wordsworth; C E Emmas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Meropenem Assessment before and after Implementation of a Small-Dose, Short-Interval Standard Dosing Regimen.

Authors:  Ivy Chow; Vincent Mabasa; Connor Chan
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-03-07

Review 7.  Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Dafna Yahav; Assaf Bivas; Abigail Fraser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 8.  Bacterial Translocation in Gastrointestinal Cancers and Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Keita Kouzu; Hironori Tsujimoto; Yoji Kishi; Hideki Ueno; Nariyoshi Shinomiya
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 9.  Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Yaakov Dickstein; Agata Schlesinger; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Karla Soares-Weiser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-29

10.  The Dose-Dependent Efficacy of Cefepime in the Empiric Management of Febrile Neutropenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Andreatos; Myrto Eleni Flokas; Anna Apostolopoulou; Michail Alevizakos; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.835

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.