K Cornish1, F Munir, J Wilding. 1. Section of Developmental Psychiatry, Divisiono f Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fragile X syndrome is a well-recognised cause of developmental delay in males and to a lesser extent females. The aim of the present study was to present a detailed cognitive and behaviour analysis of the core attention impairments frequently associated with fragile X. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two complementary studies were conducted. Study 1 examined the severity and range of behavioural problems in a group of 25 fragile X boys with fragile X compared with five control groups: a learning disabled comparison group (Down's syndrome-Trisomy 21) and four groups of normal developing control children. Two well validated rating scales were used as measures of behaviour: Study 2 examined performance by the above groups on a novel computerised task of attention that measured the ability to inhibit irrelevant responses. RESULTS: Findings from Study 1 revealed that fragile X children were significantly more hyperactive, inattentive and impulsive in comparison with the Down's syndrome children but not in comparison to the poor attention control groups. The findings from Study 2 revealed that the main impairment in fragile X was in inhibiting repetition of successful responses and in switching attention from one type of response to another in a sequence, whether it has been successful or not. CONCLUSION: Emerging evidence now supports the hypothesis that the fundamental deficit in fragile X is in controlling the flow of sequences of input and output. It is suggested that this control require inhibition.
INTRODUCTION:Fragile X syndrome is a well-recognised cause of developmental delay in males and to a lesser extent females. The aim of the present study was to present a detailed cognitive and behaviour analysis of the core attention impairments frequently associated with fragile X. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two complementary studies were conducted. Study 1 examined the severity and range of behavioural problems in a group of 25 fragile Xboys with fragile X compared with five control groups: a learning disabled comparison group (Down's syndrome-Trisomy 21) and four groups of normal developing control children. Two well validated rating scales were used as measures of behaviour: Study 2 examined performance by the above groups on a novel computerised task of attention that measured the ability to inhibit irrelevant responses. RESULTS: Findings from Study 1 revealed that fragile Xchildren were significantly more hyperactive, inattentive and impulsive in comparison with the Down's syndrome children but not in comparison to the poor attention control groups. The findings from Study 2 revealed that the main impairment in fragile X was in inhibiting repetition of successful responses and in switching attention from one type of response to another in a sequence, whether it has been successful or not. CONCLUSION: Emerging evidence now supports the hypothesis that the fundamental deficit in fragile X is in controlling the flow of sequences of input and output. It is suggested that this control require inhibition.
Authors: David P Benjamin; Ann M Mastergeorge; Andrea S McDuffie; Sara T Kover; Randi J Hagerman; Leonard Abbeduto Journal: Res Dev Disabil Date: 2014-07-23
Authors: Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; David Hessl; Leonard Abbeduto; Allan L Reiss; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Tiina K Urv Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Aimee V Franklin; Margaret K King; Valle Palomo; Ana Martinez; Lori L McMahon; Richard S Jope Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: David Hessl; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Lisa Cordeiro; Jennifer Yuhas; Edward M Ornitz; Aaron Campbell; Elizabeth Chruscinski; Crystal Hervey; James M Long; Randi J Hagerman Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 3.568