Literature DB >> 12447587

Dose reduction fluoroscopy in pediatrics.

Henrique M Lederman1, Zarir P Khademian, Marc Felice, Peter J Hurh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is essential that we find ways to reduce radiation exposure to children and maintain image quality.
OBJECTIVES: We compared radiation dose, image quality, and spatial resolution when continuous and pulse fluoroscopy with a full and half dose are applied to a phantom. The film-screen technique was compared to fluoroscopy with the digitized spot technique (fluoro grab image) in procedures such as voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 15.1-cm Plexiglas phantom, we obtained dosimetry in milligrays (mGy), spatial resolution in number of line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm), and threshold contrast resolution in number of visible holes. To measure total radiation dose, we calculated the average elapsed fluoroscopy time for VCUG to be approximately 3 min and estimated the average number of exposures as 10. Dosimetry was obtained for full dose and half dose continuous, for 15 pulses per second (pps), 7.5 pps, and 3.75 pps. These were also calculated with normal, magnification 1, and magnification 2 factors.
RESULTS: Results of the two most relevant parameters are shown: continuous full-dose fluoroscopy, 3 min, 10 photo spots, total dose of 28.7 mGy with 2 lp/mm of resolution and a threshold contrast of 2.2%, versus 3.75 pps half-dose fluoroscopy, 3 min, grab images, total dose of 3.7 mGy with 1.9 lp/mm of resolution and a threshold contrast of 2.3%.
CONCLUSION: With minimal loss of resolution there is significant dose reduction (87%) when using 3.75 pps with digitized imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447587     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-002-0696-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  9 in total

Review 1.  Are we doing enough to minimize fluoroscopic radiation exposure in children?

Authors:  Mervyn Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-08-03

2.  Radiation dose monitoring in pediatric fluoroscopy: comparison of fluoroscopy time and dose-area product thresholds for identifying high-exposure cases.

Authors:  Matthew S Lazarus; Benjamin H Taragin; William Malouf; Terry L Levin; Eduardo Nororis; Alan H Schoenfeld; Amichai J Erdfarb
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10

3.  Minimally invasive endovascular and biliary treatments of children with acute hepatic artery thrombosis following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Roberto Miraglia; Luigi Maruzzelli; Settimo Caruso; Gianluca Marrone; Kelvin Cortis; Marco Spada; Angelo Luca
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-01

Review 4.  Applying the ALARA concept to the evaluation of vesicoureteric reflux.

Authors:  Richard S Lee; David A Diamond; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

5.  How to perform the perfect voiding cystourethrogram.

Authors:  Seema Agrawalla; Rowena Pearce; T Robin Goodman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-10-15

6.  Cyclic voiding urosonography in detecting vesicoureteral reflux in children.

Authors:  Gregor Novljan; Anton Kenig; Rina Rus; Rajko B Kenda
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 7.  Patient dose reduction during voiding cystourethrography.

Authors:  Valerie L Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

8.  Imaging strategies for vesicoureteral reflux diagnosis.

Authors:  Constantinos J Stefanidis; Ekaterini Siomou
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Feasibility of using ultra-low pulse rate fluoroscopy during routine diagnostic coronary angiography.

Authors:  Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy; Matthew Scott; Omar Farouque; Mark Horrigan; David J Clark; Robert K Chan
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-07-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.