Literature DB >> 12447333

A neural network aid for the early diagnosis of cardiac ischemia in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

William G Baxt1, Frances S Shofer, Frank D Sites, Judd E Hollander.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Chest pain is the second most common chief complaint presented to the emergency department. Although the causes of chest pain span the clinical spectrum from the trivial to the life threatening, it is often difficult to identify which patients have the most common life-threatening cause, cardiac ischemia. Because of the potential for poor outcome if this diagnosis is missed, physicians have had a low threshold for admitting patients with chest pain to the hospital, the vast majority of whom are found not to have cardiac ischemia. In an earlier study with a large chest pain patient registry, an artificial neural network was shown to be able to identify the subset of patients who present to the ED with chest pain who have sustained acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to use the same registry to determine whether a network could be trained accurately to identify the larger subset of patients who have cardiac ischemia.
METHODS: Two thousand two hundred four adult patients presenting to the ED with chest pain who received an ECG were used to train and test an artificial neural network to recognize the presence of cardiac ischemia. Only the data available at the time of initial patient contact were used to replicate the conditions of real-time evaluation. Forty variables from patient history, physical examination, ECG, and the first set of chemical cardiac marker determinations were used to train and subsequently test the network. The network was trained and tested by using the jackknife variance technique to allow for the network to be trained on as many of the features of the small subset of ischemic patients as possible. Network accuracy was compared with 2 existing aids to the diagnosis of cardiac ischemia, as well as a derived regression model.
RESULTS: The network had a sensitivity of 88.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.8% to 91.4%) and a specificity of 86.2% (95% CI 84.6% to 87.7%) for cardiac ischemia despite the fact that a mean of 5% of all required network input data and 41% of cardiac chemical marker data were missing. The network also performed more accurately than the 3 other tested approaches.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an artificial neural network might be able to identify which patients who present to the ED with chest pain have cardiac ischemia with useful sensitivities and specificities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447333     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.129171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  12 in total

1.  Identification of patients with evolving coronary syndromes by using statistical models with data from the time of presentation.

Authors:  R L Kennedy; R F Harrison
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Precision diagnosis: a view of the clinical decision support systems (CDSS) landscape through the lens of critical care.

Authors:  Arnaud Belard; Timothy Buchman; Jonathan Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Christopher J Dente; Allan Kirk; Eric Elster
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Current Insights and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ikram U Haq; Karanjot Chhatwal; Krishna Sanaka; Bo Xu
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  Artificial neural networks and risk stratification in emergency departments.

Authors:  Greta Falavigna; Giorgio Costantino; Raffaello Furlan; James V Quinn; Andrea Ungar; Roberto Ippoliti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; John H Nichols; Antonio J Pena; Michael D Shapiro; Ian S Rogers; Sujith Seneviratne; Blair Alden Parry; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady; David F Brown; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  TIMI risk score: does it work equally well in both males and females?

Authors:  Marianna Karounos; Anna Marie Chang; Jennifer L Robey; Keara L Sease; Frances S Shofer; Christopher Follansbee; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  A simple statistical model for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in chest pain patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jonas Björk; Jakob L Forberg; Mattias Ohlsson; Lars Edenbrandt; Hans Ohlin; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Pretest probability assessment derived from attribute matching.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Charles L Johnson; Charles V Pollack; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Craig D Newgard; J Lee Garvey
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  George Cm Siontis; Dimitris Mavridis; John P Greenwood; Bernadette Coles; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Peter Jüni; Georgia Salanti; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-21

10.  A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; George A Wells; Allan Jaffe; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.