Literature DB >> 12447290

Quantitative assessment of psychomotor recovery after sedation and analgesia for outpatient EGD.

Juliana Willey1, John J Vargo, Jason T Connor, John A Dumot, Darwin L Conwell, Gregory Zuccaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedation and analgesia are routinely used to improve patient tolerance for GI endoscopy. Currently, assessment of postprocedure recovery uses cardiovascular and respiratory parameters but not psychomotor function. The two aims of this study were to determine degree of psychomotor recovery after conscious sedation for endoscopy when patients meet established discharge criteria, and to identify a sensitive method of testing psychomotor recovery, and thereby provide meaningful predictions regarding the ability of patients to return to daily activities.
METHODS: Outpatients undergoing elective EGD were recruited. Four psychometric tests were used to establish baseline psychomotor function before sedation and analgesia: Critical Tracking, Manual Dexterity, Multiple-Choice Reaction Time, and Letter Cancellation. Meperidine and midazolam were administered intravenously per standard nomogram. The tests were repeated immediately after the procedure and at 15-minute intervals until patients were deemed ready for discharge by recovery room personnel. Discharge criteria included an Aldrete discharge score of 10 and the ability to ambulate unhindered and carry on a simple conversation. Recovery personnel were blinded to psychometric test results. Psychomotor scores at discharge were compared with baseline scores to determine percent recovery.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (12 men, 19 women; mean age 43 years, range 18-72 years) were enrolled. When Aldrete discharge criteria were met, the average psychomotor recovery was only 60% to 70% compared with baseline. At the time of discharge, average psychomotor recovery was 86.5% of baseline. Letter Cancellation and Multiple-Choice Reaction Time had the highest sensitivity in detecting depression of psychomotor function versus baseline, with mean recovery of, respectively, 64% and 63% (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Psychomotor function remains significantly impaired when patients reach an Aldrete discharge score of 10. The Letter Cancellation test was most sensitive in detecting psychomotor impairment and recovery. Incorporating psychometric tests with current discharge criteria may identify patients who are better able to resume normal daily activities without supervision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447290     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.129609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  Significant and safe shortening of the recovery time after flumazenil-reversed midazolam sedation.

Authors:  Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Linda de Jong; Hedwig A Kos-Foekema
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Inconsistency in the Diagnosis of Functional Heartburn: Usefulness of Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Proton Pump Inhibitor Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Roberto Penagini; Rami Sweis; Aurelio Mauro; Gerson Domingues; Andres Vales; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.924

3.  BIS Targeted Propofol Sparing Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine in Outpatient ERCP: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seshadri Ramkiran; Sadasivan S Iyer; Sudhindra Dharmavaram; Chadalavada Venkata Rama Mohan; Avinash Balekudru; Radhika Kunnavil
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 4.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

Review 5.  Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-10-23

6.  Does propofol mode of administration influence psychomotor recovery time after sedation for colonoscopy: A prospective randomized assessor-blinded trial.

Authors:  Philippe J Van der Linden; Hans Verdoodt; Etienne Métallo; Chantal Plasman; Jean-François Fils; Denis Schmartz
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-09-02

Review 7.  2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation.

Authors:  Hong Jun Park; Byung-Wook Kim; Jun Kyu Lee; Yehyun Park; Jin Myung Park; Jun Yong Bae; Seung Young Seo; Jae Min Lee; Jee Hyun Lee; Hyung Ku Chon; Jun-Won Chung; Hyun Ho Choi; Myung Ha Kim; Dong Ah Park; Jae Hung Jung; Joo Young Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-02-22

8.  2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation.

Authors:  Hong Jun Park; Byung-Wook Kim; Jun Kyu Lee; Yehyun Park; Jin Myung Park; Jun Yong Bae; Seung Young Seo; Jae Min Lee; Jee Hyun Lee; Hyung Ku Chon; Jun-Won Chung; Hyun Ho Choi; Myung Ha Kim; Dong Ah Park; Jae Hung Jung; Joo Young Cho
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Acupuncture to improve tolerance of diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients without systemic sedation: results of a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (DRKS00000164).

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Katja Schwan; Thomas Bruckner; Konstanze Plaschke; Markus W Büchler; Markus Weigand; Peter Sauer; Christian Bopp; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.