STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little is known about the influence of tissue conditioners on physical property alteration of denture base resins. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of a heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four tissue conditioners and 1 heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin were used. In one experiment, acrylic resin specimens (1.0-mm thick) were immersed in the liquid component of tissue conditioners for 36 hours. In another experiment, tissue conditioners were applied to acrylic resin specimens (0.5-mm and 1.0-mm thick) in a 2-mm layer; the specimens then were immersed in distilled water for 1 week. Control specimens for both groups had no lining and were immersed in distilled water for 36 hours and 1 week, respectively. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of the acrylic resin specimens were measured at 37 degrees C with an automatic viscoelastometer. Tensile storage modulus (E'), tensile loss modulus (E"), and loss tangent (tan delta) were determined at 1 Hz. These parameters were compared with analysis of variance and the Dunnett test at a predetermined significance level of.05. All statistical comparisons were made with reference to the control group and not to each other. RESULTS: Only the liquid of Hydro-Cast significantly reduced E' and increased tan delta of the acrylic resin (P<.05). Acrylic resin specimens 0.5-mm thick and lined with tissue conditioners tended to have lower E' and higher tan delta than the control. However, only Hydro-Cast and SR-Ivoseal significantly decreased E', and only Hydro-Cast raised tan delta of the acrylic resin (P<.05). No significant difference was found among the E" values. The tissue conditioners did not affect E', E", or tan delta of acrylic resin specimens 1.0-mm thick. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, some tissue conditioners significantly plasticized the denture base acrylic resin 0.5-mm thick. However, when the acrylic resin was 1.0-mm thick, no plasticization by the tissue conditioners was noted.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little is known about the influence of tissue conditioners on physical property alteration of denture base resins. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of a heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four tissue conditioners and 1 heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin were used. In one experiment, acrylic resin specimens (1.0-mm thick) were immersed in the liquid component of tissue conditioners for 36 hours. In another experiment, tissue conditioners were applied to acrylic resin specimens (0.5-mm and 1.0-mm thick) in a 2-mm layer; the specimens then were immersed in distilled water for 1 week. Control specimens for both groups had no lining and were immersed in distilled water for 36 hours and 1 week, respectively. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of the acrylic resin specimens were measured at 37 degrees C with an automatic viscoelastometer. Tensile storage modulus (E'), tensile loss modulus (E"), and loss tangent (tan delta) were determined at 1 Hz. These parameters were compared with analysis of variance and the Dunnett test at a predetermined significance level of.05. All statistical comparisons were made with reference to the control group and not to each other. RESULTS: Only the liquid of Hydro-Cast significantly reduced E' and increased tan delta of the acrylic resin (P<.05). Acrylic resin specimens 0.5-mm thick and lined with tissue conditioners tended to have lower E' and higher tan delta than the control. However, only Hydro-Cast and SR-Ivoseal significantly decreased E', and only Hydro-Cast raised tan delta of the acrylic resin (P<.05). No significant difference was found among the E" values. The tissue conditioners did not affect E', E", or tan delta of acrylic resin specimens 1.0-mm thick. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, some tissue conditioners significantly plasticized the denture base acrylic resin 0.5-mm thick. However, when the acrylic resin was 1.0-mm thick, no plasticization by the tissue conditioners was noted.