Literature DB >> 12445610

The measurement of body segment inertial parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Jennifer L Durkin1, James J Dowling, David M Andrews.   

Abstract

Accurate body segment parameter (BSP) information is required for dynamic analyses of motion and the current methods available for obtaining these BSPs have been criticized. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) could accurately measure the BSPs of scanned objects and thus be used as a tool for measuring the BSPs of human subjects. Whole body mass (WBM) of 11 males was measured from a DXA scan and the values were compared to criterion scale-measured values by calculating the mean percent error. Two objects (plastic cylinder, human cadaver leg) were also scanned and DXA measurements of mass, length, centre of mass location (CM) and moment of inertia about the centre of mass (I(CM)) were made using custom software. Criterion BSP measurements were then made and compared to DXA BSP values by calculating the percent error. Criterion I(CM) measurements of the two objects were made using a pendulum technique and a second criterion I(CM) calculation was made for the cylinder using a geometric formula. A mean percent error of -1.05% +/-1.32% was found for WBM measurements of the human subjects. Errors for the cylinder and cadaver leg were under 3.2% for all BSPs except for I(CM) when DXA was compared to the pendulum method (14.3% and 8.2% for cylinder and leg, respectively). The errors between DXA and the pendulum method were attributed to uncertainty in the pendulum technique (J. Biomech. 2002, in Review). I(CM) error of the cylinder when DXA was compared to the geometric calculation was 2.63%. This error, combined with the low errors for all other BSPs, indicated that DXA can be used as a simple and accurate means of obtaining direct BSP information on living humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12445610     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00227-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Segmental Musculoskeletal Examinations using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): Positioning and Analysis Considerations.

Authors:  Nicolas H Hart; Sophia Nimphius; Tania Spiteri; Jodie L Cochrane; Robert U Newton
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Reliability of the elliptical zone method of estimating body segment parameters of swimmers.

Authors:  Ross H Sanders; Chuang-Yuan Chiu; Tomohiro Gonjo; Jacki Thow; Nuno Oliveira; Stelios G Psycharakis; Carl J Payton; Carla B McCabe
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Body Segment Inertial Parameters of elite swimmers Using DXA and indirect Methods.

Authors:  Marcel Rossi; Andrew Lyttle; Amar El-Sallam; Nat Benjanuvatra; Brian Blanksby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  A method for direct measurement of the first-order mass moments of human body segments.

Authors:  Yusaku Fujii; Kazuhito Shimada; Koichi Maru; Junichi Ozawa; Rong-Sheng Lu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  A low-cost three-dimensional laser surface scanning approach for defining body segment parameters.

Authors:  Petros Pandis; Anthony Mj Bull
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Whole-body and segmental analysis of body composition in adult males with achondroplasia using dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  David Sims; Gladys Onambélé-Pearson; Adrian Burden; Carl Payton; Christopher Morse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry demonstrates better reliability than segmental body composition analysis in college-aged students.

Authors:  Petr Kutáč; Václav Bunc; Martin Sigmund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inertial biometry from commercial 3D body meshes.

Authors:  Alberto E Minetti; Luca Ruggiero
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.422

10.  Oscillation and reaction board techniques for estimating inertial properties of a below-knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Jeremy D Smith; Abbie E Ferris; Gary D Heise; Richard N Hinrichs; Philip E Martin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 1.355

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.