Literature DB >> 12444040

Potential importance of vitrification in reproductive medicine.

Juergen Liebermann1, Frank Nawroth, Vladimir Isachenko, Evgenia Isachenko, Gohar Rahimi, Michael J Tucker.   

Abstract

As early as 1985, ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification was reported in an attempted alternative approach to cryostorage. Since then, vitrification techniques have entered more and more the mainstream of animal reproduction as an alternative cryopreservation method to traditional slow-cooling/rapid-thaw protocols. In addition, the last few years have seen a significant resurgence of interest in the potential benefits of vitrification protocols and techniques in human-assisted reproductive technologies. The radical strategy of vitrification results in the total elimination of ice crystal formation, both within the cells being vitrified (intracellular) and in the surrounding solution (extracellular). The protocols for vitrification are very simple. They allow cells and tissue to be placed directly into the cryoprotectant and then plunged directly into liquid nitrogen. To date, however, vitrification as a cryopreservation method has had very little practical impact on human-assisted reproduction, and human preimplantation embryo vitrification is still considered to be largely experimental. Besides the inconsistent survival rates that have been reported, another problem is the wide variety of different carriers and vessels that have been used for vitrification. Second, many different vitrification solutions have been formulated, which has not helped to focus efforts on perfecting a single approach. On the other hand, the reports of successfully completed pregnancies following vitrification at all preimplantation stages is encouraging for further research and clinical implementation. Clearly, however, attention needs to be paid to the inconsistent survival rates following vitrification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12444040     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.006833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  32 in total

1.  Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Xing-ling Wang; Xiao Zhang; Yao-qin Qin; Da-yong Hao; Hui-rong Shi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Emerging technologies in medical applications of minimum volume vitrification.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Paolo N Catalano; Umut Atakan Gurkan; Imran Khimji; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhu; Ya-Mei Xue; Ling-Yun Yang; Ling-Ying Jiang; Chao Ling; Xiao-Mei Tong; Song-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The number of blastomeres in post-thawing embryos affects the rates of pregnancy and delivery in freeze-embryo-transfer cycles.

Authors:  ShunJi Zhang; ChangFu Lu; Ge Lin; Fei Gong; GuangXiu Lu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Successful pregnancy after recryopreservation by vitrification of one blastocyst developed from a frozen embryo obtained by PESA: case report.

Authors:  Adriana Bos-Mikich; Marcelo Ferreira; Marcos Höher; Gerta Frantz; Norma Pagnoncelli Oliveira; Nilo Frantz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Developmental potential and ultrastructural injuries of metaphase II (MII) mouse oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification.

Authors:  Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Mojdeh Salehnia
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice.

Authors:  Paula Barros Terraciano; Tuane Alves Garcez; Markus Berger; Isabel Durli; Cristiana Palma Kuhl; Vitória de Oliveira Batista; Raquel de Almeida Schneider; Jaquelline Festa; Emily Pilar; Charles Ferreira; Eduardo Pandolfi Passos; Elizabeth Cirne Lima
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  Morphological and morphometric study of early-cleavage mice embryos resulting from in vitro fertilization at different cleavage stages after vitrification.

Authors:  H Homayoun; Sh Zahiri; V Hemayatkhah Jahromi; A Hassanpour Dehnavi
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.376

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.