Literature DB >> 12443969

Safety of single daily use for one week of C31G HEC gel in women.

S A Ballagh1, J M Baker, D M Henry, D F Archer.   

Abstract

Genital irritation and user acceptability was compared after seven nightly bedtime exposures to 1.2% C31G hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), 2% nonoxynol-9 (N-9) (Gynol II) or HEC vehicle alone. Sixty healthy women over 18 years old at low risk for sexually transmitted disease with normal menses were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Entrance and exit pelvic exams documented vaginal pH and Gram stain. Genital irritation was assessed by patient diaries, a telephone call 24 to 48 h after first use, colposcopy done the day after last product use, and an acceptability questionnaire at exit. Eighty percent of the women using C31G HEC experienced symptoms of vaginal burning or heat compared to 25% of the N-9 users and 5% of the vehicle users. Colposcopic findings were similar for the active treatments of C31G HEC and N-9: 50% vs. 60% developed new lesions, 25% vs. 20% had lesions that disrupted epithelial integrity, and 50% vs. 45% had minor lesions, respectively. Findings with the HEC vehicle were half as frequent. Twelve percent of women had epithelial disruption that was assessed by the colposcopist as applicator-related. Gram stains were half as likely to show bacterial vaginosis after N-9 use (6 --> 3) and one fourth as likely after vehicle or C31G HEC use (4 --> 1). When asked if they would use the product if it were an effective contraceptive, 55% of the vehicle users, 35% of the N-9 users, and 25% of the C31G HEC users agreed. Product acceptability of C31G HEC was limited by the sensation of heat or burning. The C31G HEC product had a similar safety profile to N-9 in this comparative trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12443969     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00433-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

Review 1.  Formulation, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topical microbicides.

Authors:  Jessica L Adams; Angela D M Kashuba
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 2.  Vaginal drug delivery systems for HIV prevention.

Authors:  Lisa Cencia Rohan; Alexandra B Sassi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Vaginal microbicides and the prevention of HIV transmission.

Authors:  Blayne Cutler; Jessica Justman
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 4.  Topical microbicides and HIV prevention in the female genital tract.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Cottrell; Angela D M Kashuba
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  A phase I randomized placebo controlled trial of the safety of 3% SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel®) in healthy young women administered twice daily for 14 days.

Authors:  Craig R Cohen; Joelle Brown; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Jeremy R A Paull; Clare F Price; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gene Expression Profiling of Human Vaginal Cells In Vitro Discriminates Compounds with Pro-Inflammatory and Mucosa-Altering Properties: Novel Biomarkers for Preclinical Testing of HIV Microbicide Candidates.

Authors:  Irina A Zalenskaya; Theresa Joseph; Jasmin Bavarva; Nazita Yousefieh; Suzanne S Jackson; Titilayo Fashemi; Hidemi S Yamamoto; Robert Settlage; Raina N Fichorova; Gustavo F Doncel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  SAVVY vaginal gel (C31G) for prevention of HIV infection: a randomized controlled trial in Nigeria.

Authors:  Paul J Feldblum; Adesina Adeiga; Rashidi Bakare; Silver Wevill; Anja Lendvay; Fatimah Obadaki; M Onikepe Olayemi; Lily Wang; Kavita Nanda; Wes Rountree
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.