Literature DB >> 12443050

Anatomical risk factors that distinguish dyslexia from SLI predict reading skill in normal children.

Christiana M Leonard1, Linda J Lombardino, Katherine Walsh, Mark A Eckert, Jennifer L Mockler, Lisa A Rowe, Sharyl Williams, Cheryl B DeBose.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: These studies investigated whether anatomical measures could separate phonologically-based reading disability (PD) from nonphonologically-based learning disabilities such as specific language impairment (SLI). In a previous study. four brain measures (cerebral asymmetry. summed planum temporale and parietale asymmetry, anterior cerebellar asymmetry, and a duplicated left Heschl's gyrus) distinguished a group of PD adults from reading disabled adults without specific phonological deficits (URD). Study 1 found that these measures did not distinguish 14 reading disabled children from 21 children with SLI. Instead, differences were found in cerebral volume, planum temporale asymmetry, and the size of a single left Heschl's gyrus. Study 2 demonstrated that including all seven measures in a discriminant analysis separated the adults and children into two groups: one with 100% of the PD adults and 75% of the reading disabled children and the other with 72% of the SLI children and 75% of the URD adults. Study 3 demonstrated that an anatomical risk factor index (ARF7) generated from the discriminant function with seven brain measures predicted reading in normal children. Children with ARF7 near 0 (normal anatomy) had superior verbal ability and phonological decoding scores that improved with age. Normal children with negative ARF7 the relatively s mall symmetrical structures that characterize SLI)had deficits in verbal ability. Children with positive ARF7 (the asymmetrical structures that characterize PD) had phonological decoding scores that decreased with age. These results suggest that PD and SLI are qualitatively different disorders associated with anatomical deviations in opposite directions from the population mean. LEARNING OUTCOMES: As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to: (1) distinguish the neuroanatomical features that characterize PD and SLI; (2) recognize that PD is associated with large asymmetrical brain structures while SLI is associated with smaller symmetrical brain structures; (3) understand that children with moderate sized brains and whose anatomy is intermediate between symmetry and extreme asymmetry have an enhanced probability of developing good verbal ability; (4) understand that reading disabilities depend on the interaction of neurodevelopment and the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12443050     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(02)00120-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  26 in total

Review 1.  Exploiting human anatomical variability as a link between genome and cognome.

Authors:  C M Leonard; M A Eckert; J M Kuldau
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 2.  Asymmetry and dyslexia.

Authors:  Christiana M Leonard; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Assessing child and adolescent pragmatic language competencies: toward evidence-based assessments.

Authors:  Robert L Russell; Kenneth L Grizzle
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-06

4.  Altered brain structures in the dorsal and ventral language pathways in individuals with and without developmental language disorder (DLD).

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Anthony Steven Dick; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Planum temporale asymmetry in developmental dyslexia: Revisiting an old question.

Authors:  Irene Altarelli; François Leroy; Karla Monzalvo; Joel Fluss; Catherine Billard; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Albert M Galaburda; Franck Ramus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Age-related brain structural alterations in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Carles Soriano-Mas; Jesús Pujol; Héctor Ortiz; Joan Deus; Anna López-Sala; Anna Sans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Absence of M100 source asymmetry in autism associated with language functioning.

Authors:  Gwenda L Schmidt; Michael M Rey; Janis E Oram Cardy; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Language and reading abilities of children with autism spectrum disorders and specific language impairment and their first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Kristen A Lindgren; Susan E Folstein; J Bruce Tomblin; Helen Tager-Flusberg
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.216

9.  A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the cerebellar deficit hypothesis of dyslexia.

Authors:  Michelle Y Kibby; Jill B Fancher; Rochelle Markanen; George W Hynd
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 1.987

10.  Memory and response inhibition in young children with single-suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Karen Toth; Brent Collett; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Yona Keich Cloonan; Rebecca Gaither; Mary M Cradock; Lauren Buono; Michael L Cunningham; Geraldine Dawson; Jacqueline Starr; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.