Literature DB >> 12442991

Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: part 2--Noncancer effects.

David Pennington1, Pierre Crettaz, Annick Tauxe, Lorenz Rhomberg, Kevin Brand, Olivier Jolliet.   

Abstract

In Part 1 of this article we developed an approach for the calculation of cancer effect measures for life cycle assessment (LCA). In this article, we propose and evaluate the method for the screening of noncancer toxicological health effects. This approach draws on the noncancer health risk assessment concept of benchmark dose, while noting important differences with regulatory applications in the objectives of an LCA study. We adopt the centraltendency estimate of the toxicological effect dose inducing a 10% response over background, ED10, to provide a consistent point of departure for default linear low-dose response estimates (betaED10). This explicit estimation of low-dose risks, while necessary in LCA, is in marked contrast to many traditional procedures for noncancer assessments. For pragmatic reasons, mechanistic thresholds and nonlinear low-dose response curves were not implemented in the presented framework. In essence, for the comparative needs of LCA, we propose that one initially screens alternative activities or products on the degree to which the associated chemical emissions erode their margins of exposure, which may or may not be manifested as increases in disease incidence. We illustrate the method here by deriving the betaED10 slope factors from bioassay data for 12 chemicals and outline some of the possibilities for extrapolation from other more readily available measures, such as the no observable adverse effect levels (NOAEL), avoiding uncertainty factors that lead to inconsistent degrees of conservatism from chemical to chemical. These extrapolations facilitated the initial calculation of slope factors for an additional 403 compounds; ranging from 10(-6) to 10(3) (risk per mg/kg-day dose). The potential consequences of the effects are taken into account in a preliminary approach by combining the betaED10 with the severity measure disability adjusted life years (DALY), providing a screening-level estimate of the potential consequences associated with exposures, integrated over time and space, to a given mass of chemical released into the environment for use in LCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12442991     DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  Characterizing the burden of disease of particulate matter for life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Carina J Gronlund; Sebastien Humbert; Shanna Shaked; Marie S O'Neill; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; David E Meyer; Kathie L Dionisio; Peter Egeghy; Kristin K Isaacs; Paul S Price; Kelly A Scanlon; Yu-Mei Tan; Kent Thomas; Daniel Vallero; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Prioritizing hazardous pollutants in two Nigerian water supply schemes: a risk-based approach.

Authors:  Ayotunde T Etchie; Tunde O Etchie; Gregory O Adewuyi; Kannan Krishnamurthi; S Saravanadevi; Satish R Wate
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 9.408

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.