PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of adoptive immunotherapy administered to 17 patients with TaGIII or recurrent TaGII superficial bladder cancer following transurethral tumor resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Macrophage activated killer (MAK) cells were obtained from autologous mononuclear cells harvested by apheresis, after in vitro culture for 7 days and activation with interferon-gamma on the last day of culture. The patients received 6 weekly intravesical infusions of approximately 2 x 10(8) cells each. Additionally, 5 patients received 2 or 3 more infusions at 3-month intervals. Each patient was followed for 1 year or until tumor recurrence, whichever came first. RESULTS: A total of 112 intravesical infusions were performed. During the 12-month followup period 8 patients experienced 11 common toxicity criteria grade 1 or grade 2 adverse events considered possibly related to protocol. No clinically relevant grade 1 or 2 laboratory test results were reported while the patients received treatment. In 17 patients 8 tumors recurred compared to 34 recurrences during the year before the first MAK cell infusion. This difference was highly significant (p </=0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: The promising efficacy and safety results of this study and the fact that the MAK cell treatment regimen proved feasible should encourage initiation of further large scale studies to confirm these data.
PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of adoptive immunotherapy administered to 17 patients with TaGIII or recurrent TaGII superficial bladder cancer following transurethral tumor resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Macrophage activated killer (MAK) cells were obtained from autologous mononuclear cells harvested by apheresis, after in vitro culture for 7 days and activation with interferon-gamma on the last day of culture. The patients received 6 weekly intravesical infusions of approximately 2 x 10(8) cells each. Additionally, 5 patients received 2 or 3 more infusions at 3-month intervals. Each patient was followed for 1 year or until tumor recurrence, whichever came first. RESULTS: A total of 112 intravesical infusions were performed. During the 12-month followup period 8 patients experienced 11 common toxicity criteria grade 1 or grade 2 adverse events considered possibly related to protocol. No clinically relevant grade 1 or 2 laboratory test results were reported while the patients received treatment. In 17 patients 8 tumors recurred compared to 34 recurrences during the year before the first MAK cell infusion. This difference was highly significant (p </=0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: The promising efficacy and safety results of this study and the fact that the MAK cell treatment regimen proved feasible should encourage initiation of further large scale studies to confirm these data.
Authors: Hideyuki Nakashima; Kotaro Miyake; Christopher R Clark; Joseph Bekisz; Joel Finbloom; Syed R Husain; Samuel Baron; Raj K Puri; Kathryn C Zoon Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Maximilian Burger; Nicolas Thiounn; Stefan Denzinger; Jozsef Kondas; Gerard Benoit; Manuel S Chapado; Fernando J Jimenz-Cruz; Laszlo Kisbenedek; Zoltán Szabo; Domján Zsolt; Marc O Grimm; Imre Romics; Joachim W Thüroff; Tamas Kiss; Bertrand Tombal; Manfred Wirth; Marc Munsell; Bonnie Mills; Tung Koh; Jeff Sherman Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Joseph Bekisz; Yuki Sato; Chase Johnson; Syed R Husain; Raj K Puri; Kathryn C Zoon Journal: J Interferon Cytokine Res Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Jung Hoon Kim; Joongwon Choi; Mirinae Kim; Su Jeong Kang; Young Wook Choi; Se Young Choi; Sung-Hwan Kim; In Ho Chang Journal: Investig Clin Urol Date: 2022-03
Authors: Alasdair R Fraser; Chloe Pass; Paul Burgoyne; Anne Atkinson; Laura Bailey; Audrey Laurie; Neil W A McGowan; Akib Hamid; Joanna K Moore; Benjamin J Dwyer; Marc L Turner; Stuart J Forbes; John D M Campbell Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 5.414