Literature DB >> 12441775

Body positioning of intensive care patients: clinical practice versus standards.

Sreenandh Krishnagopalan1, E William Johnson, Lewis L Low, Larry J Kaufman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in body position recorded at 15-min intervals. RESULTS Seventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5-12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for >2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80-90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12441775     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of two repositioning schedules for the prevention of pressure ulcers in patients on mechanical ventilation with alternating pressure air mattresses.

Authors:  Francisco Manzano; Manuel Colmenero; Ana María Pérez-Pérez; Delphine Roldán; María del Mar Jiménez-Quintana; María Reyes Mañas; María Angustias Sánchez-Moya; Carmen Guerrero; María Ángeles Moral-Marfil; Emilio Sánchez-Cantalejo; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Factors Facilitating and Hindering the Use of Newly Acquired Positioning Skills in Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Survey.

Authors:  Vera U Ludwig; Heidrun Pickenbrock; Daniel A Döppner
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Transforming PICU Culture to Facilitate Early Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ramona O Hopkins; Karen Choong; Carleen A Zebuhr; Sapna R Kudchadkar
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2015-12

4.  Utilization patterns and outcomes associated with central venous catheter in septic shock: a population-based study.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Physical therapy utilization in intensive care units: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Katherine E Hodgin; Amy Nordon-Craft; Kim K McFann; Meredith L Mealer; Marc Moss
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Lateral positioning for critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  Nicky Hewitt; Tracey Bucknall; Nardene M Faraone
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-12

7.  Surgical Intensive Care Unit Optimal Mobilisation Score (SOMS) trial: a protocol for an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial focused on goal-directed early mobilisation of surgical ICU patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Meyer; Anne B Stanislaus; Jarone Lee; Karen Waak; Cheryl Ryan; Richa Saxena; Stephanie Ball; Ulrich Schmidt; Trudy Poon; Simone Piva; Matthias Walz; Daniel S Talmor; Manfred Blobner; Nicola Latronico; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Evaluating optimal patient-turning procedures for reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (LS-HAPU): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Pickham; Betsy Ballew; Kristi Ebong; Julie Shinn; Mary E Lough; Barbara Mayer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING).

Authors:  Jonathan Chelly; Sandie Mazerand; Sebastien Jochmans; Claire-Marie Weyer; Franck Pourcine; Olivier Ellrodt; Nathalie Thieulot-Rolin; Jean Serbource-Goguel; Oumar Sy; Ly Van Phach Vong; Mehran Monchi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Toward mitigating pressure injuries: Detecting patient orientation from vertical bed reaction forces.

Authors:  Gordon Wong; Sharon Gabison; Elham Dolatabadi; Gary Evans; Tara Kajaks; Pamela Holliday; Hisham Alshaer; Geoff Fernie; Tilak Dutta
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2020-04-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.