Yaron Niv1, Shlomo Birkenfield. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center (Beilinson Campus), Petah Tiqva, Israel. yniv@clalit.org.il
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guidelines are important for keeping family physicians informed of the constant developments in many fields of medicine. OBJECTIVES: To compare the knowledge of gastroenterologists and family physicians regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in order to determine the need for expert guidelines. METHODS: A 25 item questionnaire on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of GERD was presented to 35 gastroenterologists and 35 family physicians. Each item was rated on a four point scale from 1 = highly recommended to 4 = not recommended. A voting system was used for each group on separate occasions. The proportions of correct answers according to the level of recommendation were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The groups' responses agreed on only 4 of the 25 items; differences between the remaining 21 were all statistically significant. For 14 items, 70% of the gastroenterologists chose the grade 1 recommendation, whereas more than 70% of the family physicians chose mostly grade 2. CONCLUSIONS: The gap in knowledge on gastroesophageal reflux disease between gastroenterologists and family physicians is significant and may have a profound impact on diagnosis and treatment. Clear and accurate guidelines may improve patient evaluation in the community.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines are important for keeping family physicians informed of the constant developments in many fields of medicine. OBJECTIVES: To compare the knowledge of gastroenterologists and family physicians regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in order to determine the need for expert guidelines. METHODS: A 25 item questionnaire on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of GERD was presented to 35 gastroenterologists and 35 family physicians. Each item was rated on a four point scale from 1 = highly recommended to 4 = not recommended. A voting system was used for each group on separate occasions. The proportions of correct answers according to the level of recommendation were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The groups' responses agreed on only 4 of the 25 items; differences between the remaining 21 were all statistically significant. For 14 items, 70% of the gastroenterologists chose the grade 1 recommendation, whereas more than 70% of the family physicians chose mostly grade 2. CONCLUSIONS: The gap in knowledge on gastroesophageal reflux disease between gastroenterologists and family physicians is significant and may have a profound impact on diagnosis and treatment. Clear and accurate guidelines may improve patient evaluation in the community.
Authors: Wasef Na'amnih; Amir Ben Tov; Amna Bdair-Amsha; Shlomi Cohen; Judith Tsamir; Gabriel Chodick; Khitam Muhsen Journal: Isr J Health Policy Res Date: 2020-06-11