Literature DB >> 12439584

Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results.

F Baum1, U Fischer, S Obenauer, E Grabbe.   

Abstract

For the first time, full-field digital mammography (FFDM) allows computer-aided detection (CAD) analysis of directly acquired digital image data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CAD system in patients with histologically correlated breast cancer depicted with FFDM. Sixty-three cases of histologically proven breast cancer detected with FFDM (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Buc, France) were analyzed using a CAD system (Image Checker V2.3, R2 Technology, Los Altos, Calif.). Fourteen of these malignancies were characterized as microcalcifications, 37 as masses, and 12 as both. The mammographic findings were categorized as BI-RADS 3 (n=5), BI-RADS 4 (n=17) and BI-RADS 5 (n=40). The sensitivity for malignant lesions and the rate of false-positive marks per image were calculated. The sensitivity and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The sensitivity of the CAD R2 system in breast cancer seen on FFDM was 89% for microcalcifications [CI(95%)=(70%; 98%)] and 81% for masses [CI(95%)=(67%; 91%)]. As expected, the detection rate was higher in lesions categorized as BI-RADS 5 (37 of 40) compared with lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 (11 of 17). In the group categorized as BI-RADS 3 the detection rate was 4 of 5 lesions; however, this group was very small. The rate of false-positive marks was 0.35 microcalcification marks/image and 0.26 mass marks/image. The overall rate of false-positive marks was 0.61 per image. CAD based on FFDM provides an optimized work flow. Results are equivalent to the results reported for CAD analysis of secondarily digitized image data. Sensitivity for microcalcifications is acceptable and for masses is low. The number of false-positive marks per image should be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439584     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1393-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

Review 1.  Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Ella Evron; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Digital mammography: current state and future aspects.

Authors:  U Fischer; K P Hermann; F Baum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Christian Sohns; Carola Werner; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of two commercial CAD systems for digital mammography.

Authors:  Stephanie Leon; Libby Brateman; Janice Honeyman-Buck; Julia Marshall
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.

Authors:  B Zheng; J H Sumkin; M L Zuley; D Lederman; X Wang; D Gur
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ryusuke Murakami; Shinichiro Kumita; Hitomi Tani; Tamiko Yoshida; Kenichi Sugizaki; Tomoyuki Kuwako; Tomonari Kiriyama; Kenta Hakozaki; Emi Okazaki; Keiko Yanagihara; Shinya Iida; Shunsuke Haga; Shinichi Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Paola Baldelli; Angelo Taibi; Cosimo Di Maggio; Mauro Gambaccini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Role of computer-aided detection in very small screening detected invasive breast cancers.

Authors:  Xavier Bargalló; Martín Velasco; Gorane Santamaría; Montse Del Amo; Pedro Arguis; Sonia Sánchez Gómez
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.

Authors:  Seung Ja Kim; Woo Kyung Moon; Nariya Cho; Joo Hee Cha; Sun Mi Kim; Jung-Gi Im
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.