Literature DB >> 12439501

Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center.

Hugh M Ehrenberg1, LeRoy Dierker, Cynthia Milluzzi, Brian M Mercer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changing prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center. STUDY
DESIGN: The prevalence of obesity in 31,542 pregnancies from January 1986 to December 1996 (group 1) was compared with the prevalence of obesity in 15,600 pregnancies between January 1997 and June 2001 (group 2). Maternal weight was divided into two groups according to measurements performed at delivery (<or=200 pounds and >200 pounds). Women who weighed >or=200 pounds were divided into subgroups for analysis (201-250 pounds, 251-300 pounds, and >300 pounds). The incidence of obesity by weight group was evaluated for a change over time; the impact of race and socioeconomic status was analyzed. A probability value of <.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Maternal obesity was significantly more common in group 2 (>200 pounds: 28% vs 21%; relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3-1.4; 201-250 pounds: 20% vs 16%; relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.3; 251-300 pounds: 5.5% vs 3.7%; relative risk, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6; >300 pounds: 1.6% vs 1.2%; relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI,1.2-1.7; P <.001 for each). Obesity was most common in African American women (>200 pounds, 28.1%; 201-250 pounds, 20.5%; 251-300 pounds, 5.5%; and >300 pounds, 2.1 %). The prevalence of obesity increased most among African American women (>200 pounds: 35 % vs 25%; relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.4-1.5; 201-250 pounds: 25 % vs 18%; relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5; 251-300 pounds: 7.3 % vs 4.6%; relative risk, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.6; >300 pounds: 2.7% vs 1.8%; relative risk, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9; P <.001 for each), and it decreased in Asian women (>200 pounds: 6.8% vs 11%; relative risk, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P <.05; 201-250 pounds: 6.3% vs 9.7%; relative risk, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4 -1.1; P >.05; 251-300 pounds: 0.6% vs 1%; relative risk, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1- 2.9; P >.05; >300 pounds: 0.0% vs 0.3%). The increase in weight over time remained statistically significant after being controlled in multivariate analysis for socioeconomic status and race. Women with milder obesity (201-250 pounds prepregnancy weight) were at increased risk for preeclampsia, gestational and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, advanced gestational age (>or=42 weeks), fetal macrosomia, and cesarean delivery (P <.001 for each), with increasing weight being associated with higher risk.
CONCLUSION: Obesity that complicates pregnancy has increased significantly over the past 15 years. The risk of perinatal complications increases with increasing maternal pregravid weight; even those women with moderate obesity are at increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439501     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  36 in total

1.  The effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcomes in urban care settings in Urmia-Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Yekta; Haleh Ayatollahi; Reza Porali; Azadeh Farzin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Rosenberg; Samantha Garbers; Heather Lipkind; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Changes in maternal characteristics in Nova Scotia, Canada from 1988 to 2001.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; K S Joseph; Linda Dodds; Alexander C Allen; Krista Jangaard; Michiel Van den Hof
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

4.  The Relationship between Body Mass Index in Pregnancy and Adverse Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Outcomes in Rural India and Pakistan.

Authors:  Vanessa L Short; Stacie E Geller; Janet L Moore; Elizabeth M McClure; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Sangappa M Dhaded; Bhalachandra S Kodkany; Sarah Saleem; Farnaz Naqvi; Omrana Pasha; Robert L Goldenberg; Archana B Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Ana L Garces; Marion Koso-Thomas; Menachem Miodovnik; Dennis D Wallace; Richard J Derman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Long-term effect of maternal obesity on pancreatic beta cells of offspring: reduced beta cell adaptation to high glucose and high-fat diet challenges in adult female mouse offspring.

Authors:  J Han; J Xu; P N Epstein; Y Qi Liu
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Self-reported reproductive outcomes among male and female 1991 Gulf War era US military veterans.

Authors:  Timothy S Wells; Linda Z Wang; Christina N Spooner; Tyler C Smith; Katia M Hiliopoulos; Deborah R Kamens; Gregory C Gray; Paul A Sato
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-07-11

7.  Madres para la Salud: design of a theory-based intervention for postpartum Latinas.

Authors:  Colleen Keller; Kathie Records; Barbara Ainsworth; Michael Belyea; Paska Permana; Dean Coonrod; Sonia Vega-López; Allison Nagle-Williams
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Low-income African American women's beliefs regarding exercise during pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Judy C Chang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-08

9.  The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health.

Authors:  Meaghan A Leddy; Michael L Power; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

10.  Large for Gestational Age Births Among South Indian Women: Temporal Trend and Risk Factors from 1996 to 2010.

Authors:  Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan; Bijesh Yadav; Veerasamy Silambarasan; Reeta Vijayaselvi; Ruby Jose
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.