Literature DB >> 12439473

Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need.

Allen R Firestone1, F Michael Beck, Frank M Beglin, Katherine W l Vig.   

Abstract

The need for orthodontic treatment has an objective component based on occlusal traits and a subjective component based on the esthetic impact of the occlusion. An occlusal index that measures the objective deviation from normal or ideal occlusion might be sufficient to mirror the subjective opinion of orthodontists about treatment need. The objective of this study was to determine whether the American (US) and United Kingdom (UK) weightings of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index are valid instruments with which to determine treatment need. Fifteen orthodontists rated the need for orthodontic treatment of 170 casts. Their collective decision was compared with the PAR value for the cast determined by a calibrated examiner. A range of suggested treatment cutoff points from the literature was used to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and optimized cutoff points. The cutoff points were 17 for both the US PAR and the UK PAR, and sensitivity, specificity, and kappa were 92%, 86%, and 0.77 for the US PAR and 92%, 89%, and 0.80 for the UK PAR. The area under the ROC curve was 97% for the US PAR and the UK PAR. Both the US PAR and the UK PAR scores were excellent predictors of orthodontic treatment need as determined by a panel of orthodontists. An occlusal index used to measure deviation from normal or ideal occlusion might perform as well as indexes of treatment need in predicting orthodontists' evaluations of treatment need.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439473     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.128465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions.

Authors:  Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; He-Kyong Kang; Archana Dhawan; Riyad Al-Qawasmi; Rafael Rocha Pacheco
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Influence of single-jaw surgery vs bimaxillary surgery on the outcome and duration of combined orthodontic-surgical treatment.

Authors:  Ian Arad; Jasveer Jandu; Paul Bassett; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Did the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic affect orthodontic treatment outcomes? A clinical evaluation using the objective grading system and Peer Assessment Rating index.

Authors:  Pamir Meriç; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Alternative for Orthodontic Treatment Need Decision in Relation to Angle Classification.

Authors:  Lale Taner; Fatma Deniz Uzuner; Yağmur Çaylak; Zeynep Gençtürk; Emine Kaygısız
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-03-01

5.  The Dental Aesthetic Index and dental health component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as tools in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Chrystiane F Cardoso; Alexandre F Drummond; Elisabeth M B Lages; Henrique Pretti; Efigênia F Ferreira; Mauro Henrique N G Abreu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Malocclusion severity and its associations with oral health-related quality of life in an adult population.

Authors:  Linnea Närhi; Mimmi Tolvanen; Pertti Pirttiniemi; Anna-Sofia Silvola
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.131

7.  Malocclusion and TMJ disorders in teenagers from private and public schools in Mexico City.

Authors:  Leonor Sánchez-Pérez; María-Esther Irigoyen-Camacho; Nelly Molina-Frechero; Patricia Mendoza-Roaf; Carlo Medina-Solís; Enrique Acosta-Gío; Gerardo Maupomé
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  Orthodontic treatment of children/adolescents with special health care needs: an analysis of treatment length and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Moritz Blanck-Lubarsch; Ariane Hohoff; Dirk Wiechmann; Thomas Stamm
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.