Literature DB >> 12439307

Dynamic MRI after surgical repair for pelvic organ prolapse.

Hubert Gufler1, Giovanni DeGregorio, Sabine Dohnicht, Karl-Heinz Allmann, Aurora Rohr-Reyes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare dynamic MRI measurement results from patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after surgical repair and to correlate postoperative MRI findings with the results of physical examination and patients' complaints.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty women were included in this prospective study. Fifteen patients with uterovaginal or vaginal vault descent and 15 asymptomatic female volunteers underwent dynamic MRI using a single-shot, fast spin-echo sequence with half-Fourier data acquisition. Single-slice midsagittal images of pelvic organs were obtained at maximal pelvic strain and at perineal contraction. Dynamic MRI was repeated on all patients 2-4 months after surgical repair. Postoperative and preoperative dynamic MRIs were compared with the normal values of the volunteer group. Postoperative MRIs were correlated with the clinical findings after surgical repair.
RESULTS: Seven patients reported symptoms after surgical repair, although only two had pathologic findings on physical examination (residual urine associated with third-degree stress urinary incontinence, and bladder neck descent). MRI showed pathologic changes in five of these patients. Two patients with persistent first-degree stress incontinence had no pathologic findings on MRI.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic MRI is helpful in the evaluation of persistent patient complaints after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and detects more defects than physical examination does.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439307     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200209000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  3 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal versus vaginal prolapse surgery with mesh.

Authors:  Shimon Ginath; Alan D Garely; Jonathan S Luchs; Azin Shahryarinejad; Cedric K Olivera; Sue Zhou; Charles J Ascher-Walsh; Alexander Condrea; Michael L Brodman; Michael D Vardy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  [Imaging for urinary incontinence].

Authors:  I Soljanik; K Brocker; O Solyanik; C G Stief; R Anding; R Kirschner-Hermanns
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group.

Authors:  Rania Farouk El Sayed; Celine D Alt; Francesca Maccioni; Matthias Meissnitzer; Gabriele Masselli; Lucia Manganaro; Valeria Vinci; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.