Literature DB >> 12439082

Motor output is more variable during eccentric compared with concentric contractions.

Evangelos A Christou1, Les G Carlton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the ability of 10 young (25.3 +/- 2.8 yr) healthy individuals to control knee-extension force during several discrete concentric and eccentric contractions.
METHODS: Subjects performed maximal and submaximal tasks on a KIN-COM isokinetic dynamometer. The submaximal tasks were to match a force-time parabola with a time to peak force of 200 ms at five target-forces (50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 N).
RESULTS: Mean peak force produced by the subjects at each target-force during concentric and eccentric contractions was similar. Mean time to peak force, however, was much shorter for eccentric contractions and was not influenced by increases in the level of force. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of peak force was greater during eccentric compared with concentric contractions. The SD of time to peak force was greater for concentric contractions; however, when normalized to the mean time to peak force produced (CV), eccentric contractions were more variable.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide evidence that even in young adults the control of motor output is different for eccentric compared with concentric contractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439082     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200211000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  13 in total

1.  Long-term adaptations differ for shortening and lengthening contractions.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Hillary Lindheim; Ana Carolina de Miranda Marzullo; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Changes in muscle fascicles of tibialis anterior during anisometric contractions are not associated with motor-output variability of the ankle dorsiflexors in young and old adults.

Authors:  Mark Jesunathadas; Thorsten Rudroff; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Changes in fluctuation of isometric force following eccentric and concentric exercise of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Andrew P Lavender; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The role of different submovement types during pointing to a target.

Authors:  Deric Wisleder; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Mandibular physiological tremor is reduced by increasing-force ramp contractions and periodontal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Muscle force and movement variability before and after total knee arthroplasty: A review.

Authors:  Jessica W Smith; Jesse C Christensen; Robin L Marcus; Paul C LaStayo
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-04-18

8.  Forced ventilation increases variability of isometric finger forces.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Nobuo Yasuda
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Aging and movement errors when lifting and lowering light loads.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2010-10-14

10.  Timing variability and not force variability predicts the endpoint accuracy of fast and slow isometric contractions.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Evangelos A Christou; Joel A Enoka; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.