Literature DB >> 12438800

Comparative mapping in equids: the asine X chromosome is rearranged compared to horse and Hartmann's mountain zebra.

T Raudsepp1, T L Lear, B P Chowdhary.   

Abstract

The X chromosomes of the extant equids, in general, share morphology and banding pattern similarities. However, the donkey X is, in part, an exception because of significantly different centromeric index and variant banding patterns in the pericentromeric region. To verify the underlying molecular basis of this difference, twelve equine BAC clones were FISH mapped to donkey (EAS) and Hartmann's mountain zebra (EZH) metaphase spreads. Loci from the terminal region of Xp and distal to terminal regions of the Xq showed the same order and relative position in all three species, implying cross-species conservation of these chromosomal segments. However, loci from the proximal/pericentromeric regions of either arms showed similar FISH locations in horse and zebra but a slightly deviant location and relative position in the donkey. Three of the markers (tel-OTC, TRAP170 and (ps)ALDH2- cen) located on the short arm of ECAX and EZHX were found inverted on the long arm of EASX, along with the transposition of the centromere. This molecular evidence of a pericentromeric inversion helps define the likely evolutionary breakpoints causing the rearrangement. The breakpoints most likely correspond to the region between Xp16-->q12 in the horse and Xp12-->q13 in the donkey. The findings coupled with the highly conserved X-chromosome gene order between horse and outgroup species, human and cat, suggest that the equine type X is ancestral while the asine type X arose as a result of an independent inversion event. The study adds two new markers to horse, 11 to donkey and 12 to Hartmann's zebra gene maps, thus contributing to the expansion of comparative maps in the equids. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12438800     DOI: 10.1159/000063050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  8 in total

1.  X chromosome painting in Microtus: origin and evolution of the giant sex chromosomes.

Authors:  J A Marchal; M J Acosta; H Nietzel; K Sperling; M Bullejos; R Díaz de la Guardia; A Sánchez
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Subchromosomal karyotype evolution in Equidae.

Authors:  P Musilova; S Kubickova; J Vahala; J Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  The horse genome derby: racing from map to whole genome sequence.

Authors:  Bhanu P Chowdhary; Terje Raudsepp
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Karyotypic relationships in Asiatic asses (kulan and kiang) as defined using horse chromosome arm-specific and region-specific probes.

Authors:  Petra Musilova; Svatava Kubickova; Petr Horin; Roman Vodicka; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Experimental cross-species infection of donkeys with equine hepacivirus and analysis of host immune signatures.

Authors:  André Gömer; Christina Puff; Birthe Reinecke; Stephanie Bracht; Maria Conze; Wolfgang Baumgärtner; Jörg Steinmann; Karsten Feige; Jessika M V Cavalleri; Eike Steinmann; Daniel Todt
Journal:  One Health Outlook       Date:  2022-05-09

6.  Intrachromosomal Rearrangements in Rodents from the Perspective of Comparative Region-Specific Painting.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Natalya A Serdyukova; Polina L Perelman; Svetlana V Pavlova; Nina S Bulatova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Roscoe Stanyon; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Birth, evolution, and transmission of satellite-free mammalian centromeric domains.

Authors:  Solomon G Nergadze; Francesca M Piras; Riccardo Gamba; Marco Corbo; Federico Cerutti; Joseph G W McCarter; Eleonora Cappelletti; Francesco Gozzo; Rebecca M Harman; Douglas F Antczak; Donald Miller; Maren Scharfe; Giulio Pavesi; Elena Raimondi; Kevin F Sullivan; Elena Giulotto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Improved de novo genomic assembly for the domestic donkey.

Authors:  Gabriel Renaud; Bent Petersen; Andaine Seguin-Orlando; Mads Frost Bertelsen; Andrew Waller; Richard Newton; Romain Paillot; Neil Bryant; Mark Vaudin; Pablo Librado; Ludovic Orlando
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.