Literature DB >> 12438530

Benzamide-type AMPA receptor modulators form two subfamilies with distinct modes of action.

Amy C Arai1, Yan-Fang Xia, Gary Rogers, Gary Lynch, Markus Kessler.   

Abstract

CX516 (BDP-12) and CX546, two first-generation benzamide-type AMPA receptor modulators, were compared with regard to their influence on AMPA receptor-mediated currents, autaptic responses in cultured hippocampal neurons, hippocampal excitatory postsynaptic currents, synaptic field potentials, and agonist binding. The two drugs exhibited comparable potencies in most tests but differed in their efficacy and in their relative impact on various response parameters. CX546 greatly prolonged the duration of synaptic responses, and it slowed 10-fold the deactivation of excised-patch currents following 1-ms pulses of glutamate. The effects of CX516 on those measures were, by comparison, small; however, the drug was equally or more efficacious than CX546 in increasing the amplitude of synaptic responses. This double dissociation suggests that amplitude and duration of synaptic responses are governed by different aspects of receptor kinetics, which are differentially modified by the two drugs. These effects can be reproduced in receptor simulations if one assumes that CX516 preferentially accelerates channel opening while CX546 slows channel closing. In binding tests, CX546 caused an approximately 2-fold increase in the affinity for radiolabeled agonists, whereas CX516 was ineffective. More importantly, even millimolar concentrations of CX516 did not influence the dose-response relation for CX546, suggesting the possibility that they bind to different sites. Taken together, the evidence suggests that benzamide modulators from the Ampakine family form two subgroups with different modes and sites of action. Of these, CX516-type drugs may have the greater therapeutic utility because of their limited efficacy in prolonging synaptic responses and in attenuating receptor desensitization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12438530     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.040360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  30 in total

Review 1.  Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Traynelis; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Chris J McBain; Frank S Menniti; Katie M Vance; Kevin K Ogden; Kasper B Hansen; Hongjie Yuan; Scott J Myers; Ray Dingledine
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 2.  Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor structure and pharmacology.

Authors:  James N C Kew; John A Kemp
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The binding site for allosteric modulators of AMPA receptor.

Authors:  I G Tikhonova; M I Lavrov; V A Palyulin; N S Zefirov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.788

4.  Targeting AMPA receptor gating processes with allosteric modulators and mutations.

Authors:  Nicholas A Mitchell; Mark W Fleck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Therapeutic potential of positive AMPA receptor modulators in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Stefano Marenco; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Physiological significance of high- and low-affinity agonist binding to neuronal and recombinant AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Markus Kessler; Erika Suzuki; Kyle Montgomery; Amy C Arai
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Glutamate receptor-mediated restoration of experience-dependent place field expansion plasticity in aged rats.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Andrew P Maurer; Zhiyong Yang; Zaneta Navratilova; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  AMPAkines and morphine provide complementary analgesia.

Authors:  Yongjun Sun; Kevin Liu; Erik Martinez; Jahrane Dale; Dong Huang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Mechanisms underlying cognitive enhancement and reversal of cognitive deficits in nonhuman primates by the ampakine CX717.

Authors:  R E Hampson; R A España; G A Rogers; L J Porrino; S A Deadwyler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Neto1 is a novel CUB-domain NMDA receptor-interacting protein required for synaptic plasticity and learning.

Authors:  David Ng; Graham M Pitcher; Rachel K Szilard; Andréa Sertié; Marijana Kanisek; Steven J Clapcote; Tatiana Lipina; Lorraine V Kalia; Daisy Joo; Colin McKerlie; Miguel Cortez; John C Roder; Michael W Salter; Roderick R McInnes
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.