Literature DB >> 12438474

Managing severe lower limb spasticity in multiple sclerosis: does intrathecal phenol have a role?

L Jarrett1, P Nandi, A J Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Established treatment options for managing severe lower limb spasticity and associated pain are of limited value in people with advanced multiple sclerosis (MS). This has resulted in a resurgence of the use of lumbar intrathecal phenol injection (IP). The aim of this study was to investigate the authors' experience with IP.
METHODS: This observational study collected cross sectional data from patients with progressive MS who received IP for severe lower limb spasticity. Data from 25 patients were collected prospectively before and after treatment. In 15 cases the data related to the first treatment and in 10 to serial injections. Outcome measures collected included the Ashworth scale, a spasm frequency scale, a pain rating score, and the percentage achievement of practical goals.
RESULTS: After injection, all patients demonstrated reduced lower limb tone bilaterally. After the initial injection there was significant improvement on the targeted as compared with the non-targeted side (Wilcoxon rank p=0.003), while no difference in the degree of improvement between the targeted and non-targeted side was seen after serial injections (Wilcoxon rank p=0.731). Twenty four patients were easier to position and 21 had a reduction in their spasm frequency and intensity. Eleven patients with pain reported benefit. Carers found washing and dressing easier in 16 patients and improved safety when using the hoist in 10. Six patients had recurrence of skin breakdown and five patients reported transient adverse changes in their bowel function.
CONCLUSIONS: IP can reduce lower limb tone bilaterally after both initial and serial injections. This is most noticeable on the targeted side after initial injection. IP can reduce spasms and pain, leading to improvements in care and overall comfort. IP is an effective treatment option in the management of severe spasticity. Documented selection criteria are essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12438474      PMCID: PMC1757337          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  15 in total

1.  Intrathecal phenol in the treatment of reflex spasms and spasti city.

Authors:  R E KELLY; P C GAUTIER-SMITH
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1959-12-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Intrathecal phenol for intractable pain: safety and dangers of the method.

Authors:  P W NATHAN; T G SCOTT
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1958-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Relief of pain in incurable cancer.

Authors:  R M MAHER
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1955-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The use of phenol as a neurolytic agent: a review.

Authors:  Kathleen M Wood
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Intrathecal baclofen: does tolerance occur?

Authors:  M N Akman; P G Loubser; W H Donovan; M E O'Neill; C D Rossi
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1993-08

6.  Effects of intrathecal phenol in man. A histological study.

Authors:  R R Hansebout; J B Cosgrove
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy in patients with intractable spasticity.

Authors:  W J Becker; C J Harris; M L Long; D P Ablett; G M Klein; D A DeForge
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

Authors:  J F Kurtzke
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index.

Authors:  B C Robinson
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1983-05

10.  Intrathecal baclofen for severe spinal spasticity.

Authors:  R D Penn; S M Savoy; D Corcos; M Latash; G Gottlieb; B Parke; J S Kroin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-06-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gavin Giovannoni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Assessment and Measurement of Spasticity in MS: State of the Evidence.

Authors:  Cinda L Hugos; Michelle H Cameron
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Prolotherapy Induces an Inflammatory Response in Human Tenocytes In Vitro.

Authors:  Emmanuel C Ekwueme; Mahir Mohiuddin; Jazmin A Yarborough; P Gunnar Brolinson; Denitsa Docheva; Hugo A M Fernandes; Joseph W Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Poststroke motor dysfunction and spasticity: novel pharmacological and physical treatment strategies.

Authors:  Stefan Hesse; Cordula Werner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Current management of pain associated with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Walter Pöllmann; Wolfgang Feneberg
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 6.  Spasticity - Pathogenesis, prevention and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Anju Ghai; Nidhi Garg; Sarla Hooda; Tushar Gupta
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.