Literature DB >> 12438010

Genotoxicity risk assessment: a proposed classification strategy.

Kerry L Dearfield1, Michael C Cimino, Nancy E McCarroll, Irving Mauer, Lawrence R Valcovic.   

Abstract

Recent advances in genetic toxicity (mutagenicity) testing methods and in approaches to performing risk assessment are prompting a renewed effort to harmonize genotoxicity risk assessment across the world. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) first published Guidelines for Mutagenicity Risk Assessment in 1986 that focused mainly on transmissible germ cell genetic risk. Somatic cell genetic risk has also been a risk consideration, usually in support of carcinogenicity assessments. EPA and other international regulatory bodies have published mutagenicity testing requirements for agents (pesticides, pharmaceuticals, etc.) to generate data for use in genotoxicity risk assessments. The scheme that follows provides a proposed harmonization approach in which genotoxicity assessments are fully developed within the risk assessment paradigm used by EPA, and sets out a process that integrates newer thinking in testing battery design with the risk assessment process. A classification strategy for agents based on inherent genotoxicity, dose-responses observed in the data, and an exposure analysis is proposed. The classification leads to an initial level of concern for genotoxic risk to humans. A total risk characterization is performed using all relevant toxicity data and a comprehensive exposure evaluation in association with the genotoxicity data. The result of this characterization is ultimately used to generate a final level of concern for genotoxic risk to humans. The final level of concern and characterized genotoxicity risk assessment are communicated to decision makers for possible regulatory action(s) and to the public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12438010     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00236-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

1.  Could contaminant induced mutations lead to a genetic diversity overestimation?

Authors:  Olímpia Sobral; Maria Aparecida Marin-Morales; Rui Ribeiro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Assessment of mutagenic, genotoxic, and cytotoxic potential of water samples of Harike wetland: a Ramsar site in India using different ex vivo biological systems.

Authors:  Jasmit Kaur; Ashun Chaudhary; Rajbir Kaur; Saroj Arora
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Mutagenicity evaluation of Anastatica hierochuntica L. aqueous extract in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Siti Rosmani Md Zin; Zahurin Mohamed; Mohammed A Alshawsh; Won F Wong; Normadiah M Kassim
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-12-13

4.  Parental exposure to methyl methane sulfonate of three-spined stickleback: contribution of DNA damage in male and female germ cells to further development impairment in progeny.

Authors:  R Santos; M Palos-Ladeiro; A Besnard; J Reggio; E Vulliet; J M Porcher; S Bony; W Sanchez; A Devaux
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Antigenotoxic effect of nordihydroguaiaretic acid against chlormadinone acetate-induced genotoxicity in mice bone-marrow cells.

Authors:  Yasir Hasan Siddique; Gulshan Ara; Tanveer Beg; Mohammad Afzal
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 2.343

6.  A review of the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of aspartame: does it safe or not?

Authors:  Serkan Yılmaz; Aslı Uçar
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Safety Profile Investigations of Meyna spinosa (Roxb.) and Oroxylum indicum (Linn.) Extracts Collected from Northeast India.

Authors:  Shweta Singh; Pronobesh Chattopadhyay; Sahindra Kumar Borthakur; Rudragoud Policegoudra
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.085

8.  Genotoxic Evaluation of Surfactin C in Chinese Hamster Lung Cell Line.

Authors:  Jong Hwan Lim; In Bae Song; Byung Kwon Park; Myoung Seok Kim; Youn-Hwan Hwang; Hyo In Yun
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2009-03-01

9.  Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles are not Cytotoxic or Clastogenic in Human Skin Cells.

Authors:  Cynthia L Browning; Therry The; Michael D Mason; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  J Environ Anal Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-06

10.  Acute and subchronic toxicity of the antitumor agent rhodium (II) citrate in Balb/c mice after intraperitoneal administration.

Authors:  Marcella L B Carneiro; Cláudio A P Lopes; Ana L Miranda-Vilela; Graziella A Joanitti; Izabel C R da Silva; Márcia R Mortari; Aparecido R de Souza; Sônia N Báo
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2015-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.