OBJECTIVES: Although it is well known that informal caregiving can have negative outcomes, and is an important factor in institutionalization, there is currently no common model to assess psychological distress in caregivers. In this study, we considered the conceptualization of caregiving distress, and present a five-dimension, 17-item Caregiving Distress Scale (CDS). DESIGN: The CDS was developed by administering several scales from the caregiving literature to a sample of 80 Parkinson's disease caregivers longitudinally. METHOD: A total of 58 items from published questionnaires were reduced initially by a hierarchical cluster analysis, then by factor analysis. RESULTS: This procedure produced five distinctive subscales - relationship distress, emotional burden, care-receiver demands, social impact, and personal cost - that also had high internal reliability. CONCLUSION: The CDS is quick to administer and score, and has the potential to be used to profile an individual caregiving situation. Of critical importance for the application of findings from the caregiving literature, the scale can be used to target the type of intervention for the amelioration of caregiving distress.
OBJECTIVES: Although it is well known that informal caregiving can have negative outcomes, and is an important factor in institutionalization, there is currently no common model to assess psychological distress in caregivers. In this study, we considered the conceptualization of caregiving distress, and present a five-dimension, 17-item Caregiving Distress Scale (CDS). DESIGN: The CDS was developed by administering several scales from the caregiving literature to a sample of 80 Parkinson's disease caregivers longitudinally. METHOD: A total of 58 items from published questionnaires were reduced initially by a hierarchical cluster analysis, then by factor analysis. RESULTS: This procedure produced five distinctive subscales - relationship distress, emotional burden, care-receiver demands, social impact, and personal cost - that also had high internal reliability. CONCLUSION: The CDS is quick to administer and score, and has the potential to be used to profile an individual caregiving situation. Of critical importance for the application of findings from the caregiving literature, the scale can be used to target the type of intervention for the amelioration of caregiving distress.
Authors: Roseanne D Dobkin; Jade Tiu Rubino; Lesley A Allen; Jill Friedman; Michael A Gara; Margery H Mark; Matthew Menza Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-03-12
Authors: Roseanne D Dobkin; Matthew Menza; Lesley A Allen; Michael A Gara; Margery H Mark; Jade Tiu; Karina L Bienfait; Jill Friedman Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Roseanne D Dobkin; Matthew Menza; Lesley A Allen; Jade Tiu; Jill Friedman; Karina L Bienfait; Michael A Gara; Margery H Mark Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: David J Daley; Katherine Ho Deane; Richard J Gray; Paul F Worth; Allan B Clark; Kanagasabesan Sabanathan; Michael Pfeil; Phyo K Myint Journal: Trials Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Rosanna Cousins; Hikari Ando; Everard Thornton; Biswajit Chakrabarti; Robert Angus; Carolyn Young Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2013-11-01