Literature DB >> 12437160

Alternative calibration approaches to compensate the effect of co-extracted matrix components in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues in plant materials.

Jitka Zrostlíková1, Jana Hajslová, Jan Poustka, Pavel Begany.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of different calibration approaches in a multi- and single-residue analysis of modern pesticides in plant matrices using liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS). In the first set of experiments the determination of eight pesticides representing different groups of polar/unstable pesticides (carbamates, benzimidazoles, azoles, benzoylphenylurea) in apple samples was performed. The trueness and precision of data obtained by using: (i) external solvent standard calibration, (ii) external matrix-matched standard calibration and (iii) echo-peak internal standard calibration was compared. The last mentioned method is a novel technique providing the possibility to inject internal standard of the same identity as a target analyte, so that its retention time is close to the analyte from the sample. According to expectation, when using external standard solvent calibration the results were under- or overestimated due to suppression or enhancement of analyte's signal by matrix components. On the other hand with the use of matrix-matched calibration accurate data were obtained. With echo-peak technique accurate results comparable to those obtained by matrix calibration were obtained for six out of eight pesticides. In the second set of experiment we used the echo-peak technique to overcome the problem with the response instability in the analysis of chlormequat in pear concentrate samples. As an internal standard method the echo-peak technique provided the possibility of monitoring of signal decrease during the analytical sequence and to compensate this decrease by relating sample peak area relatively to this internal standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12437160     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01196-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of matrix effect and chromatography efficiency: new parameters for validation of method development.

Authors:  Eduard Rogatsky; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Determination of glyphosate in surface water with high organic matter content.

Authors:  Vahur Toss; Ivo Leito; Sergei Yurchenko; Rene Freiberg; Anneli Kruve
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Comparison of soil sorption parameters of pesticides measured by batch and centrifugation methods using an andosol.

Authors:  Yutaka Motoki; Takashi Iwafune; Nobuyasu Seike; Keiya Inao; Sayuri Namiki
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.519

4.  Analytical methods for quantitation of prenylated flavonoids from hops.

Authors:  Dejan Nikolić; Richard B van Breemen
Journal:  Curr Anal Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.892

5.  Evaluation of Matrix Effects in Quantifying Microbial Secondary Metabolites in Indoor Dust Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatograph-Tandem Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Mukhtar Jaderson; Ju-Hyeong Park
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2018-12-21

6.  Analysis of mold and mycotoxins in naturally infested indoor building materials.

Authors:  Viktoria Lindemann; Tim Schleiner; Ulrich Maier; Hubert Fels; Benedikt Cramer; Hans-Ulrich Humpf
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.082

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.