Literature DB >> 12435846

Repair of oxidative DNA damage: assessing its contribution to cancer prevention.

Andrew Collins1, Vikki Harrington.   

Abstract

DNA repair is a crucial factor in maintaining a low steady-state level of oxidative DNA damage and protecting us from cancer. Cancer case-control studies, using indirect assays in which chromosome breakage in lymphocytes is taken as a measure of failure to repair DNA, indicate an association between poor repair and cancer risk, but case-control studies can be misleading. Surprisingly little is known of the variations in repair capacity within healthy human populations. It is likely that differences in repair enzyme activity result from genetic polymorphisms in repair genes, which have been shown, in some cases, to be linked to cancer. There is a need for prospective studies, in which genotype is analysed (for a range of repair and related genes) and repair activity measured before cancer has developed. Using a new method to measure repair in an extract of lymphocytes, based on a modification of the comet assay, we are seeking answers to the following questions: what is the normal range of repair activities in healthy humans; do differences in repair capacity correlate with genetic variations; is low repair capacity associated with a high risk of cancer; how important is DNA repair rate in determining the steady-state level of damage; what is the extent of intra-individual variation; is repair modulated by environmental factors or induced by damage; are there differences in repair capacity between men and women; what is the association of DNA repair with ageing?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435846     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/17.6.489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  23 in total

1.  In vitro antioxidant efficacy and the therapeutic potential of Wendlandia heynei (Schult.) Santapau & Merchant against bisphenol A-induced hepatotoxicity in rats.

Authors:  Sonia Maryam; Muhammad Rashid Khan; Sayed Afzal Shah; Zartash Zahra; Muhammad Majid; Moniba Sajid; Saima Ali
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Prospective analysis of DNA damage and repair markers of lung cancer risk from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Irene M Jones; Qingyi Wei; Xifeng Wu; Margaret R Spitz; Douglas A Stram; Myron D Gross; Wen-Yi Huang; Li-E Wang; Jian Gu; Cynthia B Thomas; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Role of genetic susceptibility in development of treatment-related adverse outcomes in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Solid tumor second primary neoplasms: who is at risk, what can we do?

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Shrujal S Baxi; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Chaya S Moskowitz
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Association of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G Asp1104His polymorphism with breast cancer risk: A cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Xu; Long-Chuan Xie; Ling-Ling Yuan; Xiao-Li Hu; Jian-Qiang Jin; Yu-Ming Niu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11

7.  Genotoxicity associated with oxidative damage in the liver and kidney of mice exposed to dimethoate subchronic intoxication.

Authors:  Imen Ayed-Boussema; Karima Rjiba; Amal Moussa; Nourhène Mnasri; Hassen Bacha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Environmental risk appraisement of disinfection by-products (DBPs) in plant model system: Allium cepa.

Authors:  Jyoti Ranjan; Tamal Mandal; Dalia Dasgupta Mandal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Genotoxicity assessment of acute exposure of 2, 4-dinitroanisole, its metabolites and 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene to Daphnia carinata.

Authors:  Annamalai Prasath; Logeshwaran Panneerselvan; Arthur Provatas; Ravi Naidu; Mallavarapu Megharaj
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Functions and evolution of selenoprotein methionine sulfoxide reductases.

Authors:  Byung Cheon Lee; Alexander Dikiy; Hwa-Young Kim; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.