Literature DB >> 12435719

Pharmacodynamic modeling of clarithromycin against macrolide-resistant [PCR-positive mef(A) or erm(B)] Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable serum and epithelial lining fluid free-drug concentrations.

Ayman M Noreddin1, Danielle Roberts, Kim Nichol, Aleksandra Wierzbowski, Daryl J Hoban, George G Zhanel.   

Abstract

The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and clinical outcomes remains understudied. The present study, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, assessed clarithromycin (CLR) activity against mef(A)-positive and erm(B)-negative Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates by simulating free-drug concentrations in serum and both total (protein-bound and free) and free drug in epithelial lining fluid (ELF). Five mef(A)-positive and erm(B)-negative strains, one mef(A)-negative and erm(B)-positive strain, and a control [mef(A)-negative and erm(B)-negative] strain of S. pneumoniae were tested. CLR was modeled using a one-compartment model, simulating a dosage of 500 mg, per os, twice a day (in serum, free-drug C(p) maximum of 2 micro g/ml, t(1/2) of 6 h; in ELF, C(ELF(total)) maximum of 35 micro g/ml, t(1/2) of 6 h; C(ELF(free)) maximum of 14 micro g/ml, t(1/2) of 6 h). Starting inocula were 10(6) CFU/ml in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. With sampling at 0, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24 h, the extent of bacterial killing was assessed. Achieving CLR T/MIC values of > or =90% (AUC(0-24)/MIC ratio, > or =61) resulted in bacterial eradication, while T>MIC values of 40 to 56% (AUC(0-24)/MIC ratios of > or =30.5 to 38) resulted in a 1.2 to 2.0 log(10) CFU/ml decrease at 24 h compared to that for the initial inoculum. CLR T/MIC values of < or =8% (AUC(0-24)/MIC ratio, < or =17.3) resulted in a static effect or bacterial regrowth. The high drug concentrations in ELF that were obtained clinically with CLR may explain the lack of clinical failures with mef(A)-producing S. pneumoniae strains, with MICs up to 8 micro g/ml. However, mef(A) isolates for which MICs are > or =16 micro g/ml along with erm(B) may result in bacteriological failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435719      PMCID: PMC132790          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4029-4034.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

Review 1.  Resistance issues and treatment implications: pneumococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and gram-negative rods.

Authors:  D E Low
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.982

2.  Increase in pneumococcal bacteraemia in Sweden.

Authors:  J Giesecke; H Fredlund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Comparison of bacteriologic eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae by clarithromycin and reports of increased antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  M H Gotfried
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 1998-1999: prevalence of mef(A) and erm(B) and susceptibilities to ketolides.

Authors:  D J Hoban; A K Wierzbowski; K Nichol; G G Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for infection due to penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: a multicenter study.

Authors:  A J Clavo-Sánchez; J A Girón-González; D López-Prieto; J Canueto-Quintero; A Sánchez-Porto; A Vergara-Campos; P Marín-Casanova; J A Córdoba-Doña
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  The continued emergence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States: an update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pneumococcal Sentinel Surveillance System.

Authors:  J C Butler; J Hofmann; M S Cetron; J A Elliott; R R Facklam; R F Breiman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  In vitro pharmacodynamic modelling simulating free serum concentrations of fluoroquinolones against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; M Walters; N Laing; D J Hoban
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Pneumococcal bacteremia--no change in mortality in 30 years: analysis of 104 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  M R Kramer; B Rudensky; I Hadas-Halperin; M Isacsohn; E Melzer
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1987-03

9.  Bacteremia with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Implications for therapy and prevention. Franklin County Pneumonia Study Group.

Authors:  J F Plouffe; R F Breiman; R R Facklam
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: clinical and epidemiologic aspects.

Authors:  J Ward
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Drug-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia: clinical relevance and approach to management.

Authors:  J D Fuller; A McGeer; D E Low
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Jomy M George; Liz Yoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Use of pharmacodynamic principles to optimise dosage regimens for antibacterial agents in the elderly.

Authors:  Ayman M Noreddin; Virginia Haynes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and gastrointestinal tolerability of a novel extended-release microsphere formulation of azithromycin.

Authors:  Richa Chandra; Ping Liu; Jeanne D Breen; Jeannine Fisher; Charles Xie; Robert LaBadie; Rebecca J Benner; Lisa J Benincosa; Amarnath Sharma
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Christel Johanson; Nancy Laing; Tamiko Hisanaga; Aleksandra Wierzbowski; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prevalence and antibacterial susceptibility of mef(A)-positive macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Thomas M File; Stephen G Jenkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of S-013420, a novel bicyclolide antibacterial, in healthy Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Furuie; Yutaka Saisho; Takayoshi Yoshikawa; Jingoro Shimada
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Influence of azithromycin and clarithromycin on macrolide susceptibility of viridans streptococci from the oral cavity of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Eisenblätter; C Klaus; M W R Pletz; H Orawa; H Hahn; J Wagner; H Lode
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Modeling the autoinhibition of clarithromycin metabolism during repeated oral administration.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Martina Kinzig; Jürgen Bulitta; Stefan Horkovics-Kovats; Fritz Sörgel; Michael Rodamer; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Dominance of multidrug resistant CC271 clones in macrolide-resistant streptococcus pneumoniae in Arizona.

Authors:  Jolene R Bowers; Elizabeth M Driebe; Jennifer L Nibecker; Bette R Wojack; Derek S Sarovich; Ada H Wong; Pius M Brzoska; Nathaniel Hubert; Andrew Knadler; Lindsey M Watson; David M Wagner; Manohar R Furtado; Michael Saubolle; David M Engelthaler; Paul S Keim
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.