Literature DB >> 12435667

Ocular distribution of intravenously administered lipid formulations of amphotericin B in a rabbit model.

David Goldblum1, Kaspar Rohrer, Beatrice E Frueh, Regula Theurillat, Wolfgang Thormann, Stefan Zimmerli.   

Abstract

Little is known about the ocular penetration of amphotericin B (AMB) and its lipid formulations, the current drug of choice in fungal endophthalmitis. The ocular distribution of AMB lipid complex (ABLC), liposomal AMB (L-AMB), and AMB deoxycholate (D-AMB) was studied in a rabbit model. D-AMB (1 mg/kg of body weight/day), ABLC (5 mg/kg/day), or L-AMB (5 mg/kg/day) was given intravenously to rabbits as a single dose or as repeated daily doses on 7 consecutive days after induction of unilateral uveitis by intravitreal injection of endotoxin. AMB concentrations in aqueous humor, vitreous humor, and plasma were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography 16 h after administration of a single dose or 24 h after the last of seven doses. After single-dose administration, L-AMB achieved at least eightfold-higher AMB concentrations in the aqueous of inflamed eyes than ABLC or D-AMB (1.21 +/- 0.58 micro g/ml versus 0.14 +/- 0.04 and 0.11 +/- 0.09 micro g/ml, respectively). At that time point no drug was detectable in the vitreous. After 7 days of treatment, the concentration of AMB in the vitreous was higher after treatment with L-AMB (0.47 +/- 0.21 micro g/ml) than after treatment with ABLC (0.27 +/- 0.18 micro g/ml) and D-AMB (0.16 +/- 0.04 micro g/ml). Similarly, AMB concentration in the aqueous was higher after repeated doses of L-AMB (0.73 +/- 0.43 micro g/ml) than after repeated doses of ABLC (0.03 +/- 0.02 micro g/ml) or D-AMB (0.13 +/- 0.06 micro g/ml). No AMB was detected in noninflamed eyes. Following systemic administration, AMB distribution to the eye is inflammation dependent and occurs sequentially, first to the aqueous and then to the vitreous. Compared to D-AMB and ABLC, L-AMB reaches higher drug concentrations in both ocular compartments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435667      PMCID: PMC132741          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3719-3723.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents: a comprehensive review of agents in clinical use, current investigational compounds, and putative targets for antifungal drug development.

Authors:  A H Groll; S C Piscitelli; T J Walsh
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  1998

Review 2.  The future of antifungal therapy.

Authors:  J R Graybill
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: recent progress and future directions.

Authors:  J W Hiemenz; T J Walsh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  Carrier effects on biological activity of amphotericin B.

Authors:  J Brajtburg; J Bolard
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Nephrotoxicity of amphotericin B.

Authors:  M A Carlson; R E Condon
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Treatment outcomes of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.

Authors:  W E Smiddy
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 7.  Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.

Authors:  N Samiy; D J D'Amico
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1996

8.  Treatment outcomes in a 10-year study of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.

Authors:  T F Essman; H W Flynn; W E Smiddy; R D Brod; T G Murray; J L Davis; P E Rubsamen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1997-03

9.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of a unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in rabbits.

Authors:  J W Lee; M A Amantea; P A Francis; E E Navarro; J Bacher; P A Pizzo; T J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: clinical efficacy and toxicities.

Authors:  A Wong-Beringer; R A Jacobs; B J Guglielmo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Ocular drug delivery.

Authors:  Ripal Gaudana; Hari Krishna Ananthula; Ashwin Parenky; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  [Strategies for antifungal treatment failure in intensive care units].

Authors:  C Arens; M Bernhard; C Koch; A Heininger; D Störzinger; T Hoppe-Tichy; M Hecker; B Grabein; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Interpretation of drug concentrations in an alternative matrix: the case of meprobamate in vitreous humor.

Authors:  Fabien Bévalot; Marie-Paule Gustin; Nathalie Cartiser; Catherine Le Meur; Daniel Malicier; Laurent Fanton
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  The facilitating effect of blue light on the antifungal agent susceptibilities of passaged conidia from the ocular-derived Fusarium solani species complex.

Authors:  Yujie Cen; Yingyu Li; Pei Zhang; Ziyuan Liu; Chen Huang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  Challenges in the Polyene- and Azole-Based Pharmacotherapy of Ocular Fungal Infections.

Authors:  Prit Lakhani; Akash Patil; Soumyajit Majumdar
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David R Andes; Cornelius J Clancy; Kieren A Marr; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; Mindy G Schuster; Jose A Vazquez; Thomas J Walsh; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David Andes; Daniel K Benjamin; Thierry F Calandra; John E Edwards; Scott G Filler; John F Fisher; Bart-Jan Kullberg; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; John H Rex; Thomas J Walsh; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Tissue penetration of antifungal agents.

Authors:  Timothy Felton; Peter F Troke; William W Hope
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Ocular penetration of caspofungin in a rabbit uveitis model.

Authors:  David Goldblum; Kathrin Fausch; Beatrice E Frueh; Regula Theurillat; Wolfgang Thormann; Stefan Zimmerli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 10.  How to manage aspergillosis in non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi; Gennaro De Pascale; Raffaele De Gaudio; Antonino Giarratano; Tereesita Mazzei; Giulia Morace; Nicola Petrosillo; Stefania Stefani; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.