INTRODUCTION: Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) utilises the percutaneous insertion of a radioactive source to inhibit myointimal hyperplasia in arteries treated by balloon angioplasty or stenting. A systematic review was performed of trials of IVBT in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). METHODS: Search strategy - the reviewers searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group trials register, DARE, CCT and NHS EED for clinical studies and trials of adjuvant IVBT in PAD. Two reviewers assessed trial quality independently. RESULTS: Fourteen clinical trials were identified by the search, representing five clinical studies (all allocated D for not randomised) and one randomised controlled trial (allocated A). The randomised trial showed a benefit for IVBT compared with placebo (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.53). In the non-randomised studies, 12 month cumulative patency rates ranged from 60-87%. There were few technical complications. In the only report involving IVBT and routine concurrent stent insertion acute thrombosis occurred in 7 (21%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Early reports have confirmed the safety and technical feasibility of IVBT. However, follow-up is too short at present to assess the durability and long-term complications of this new therapeutic option.
INTRODUCTION: Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) utilises the percutaneous insertion of a radioactive source to inhibit myointimal hyperplasia in arteries treated by balloon angioplasty or stenting. A systematic review was performed of trials of IVBT in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). METHODS: Search strategy - the reviewers searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group trials register, DARE, CCT and NHS EED for clinical studies and trials of adjuvant IVBT in PAD. Two reviewers assessed trial quality independently. RESULTS: Fourteen clinical trials were identified by the search, representing five clinical studies (all allocated D for not randomised) and one randomised controlled trial (allocated A). The randomised trial showed a benefit for IVBT compared with placebo (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.53). In the non-randomised studies, 12 month cumulative patency rates ranged from 60-87%. There were few technical complications. In the only report involving IVBT and routine concurrent stent insertion acute thrombosis occurred in 7 (21%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Early reports have confirmed the safety and technical feasibility of IVBT. However, follow-up is too short at present to assess the durability and long-term complications of this new therapeutic option.