Literature DB >> 12433408

Caffeine and ryanodine demonstrate a role for the ryanodine receptor in the organ of Corti.

Richard P Bobbin1.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that the release of Ca(2+) from ryanodine receptor activated Ca(2+) stores in vivo can affect the function of the cochlea was tested by examining the effects of caffeine (1-10 mM) and ryanodine (1-333 microM), two drugs that release Ca(2+) from these intracellular stores. The drugs were infused into the perilymph compartment of the guinea pig cochlea while sound (10 kHz) evoked cochlear potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs; 2f(1)-f(2)=8 kHz, f(2)=12 kHz) were monitored. Caffeine significantly suppressed the compound action potential of the auditory nerve (CAP) at low intensity (56 dB SPL; 3.3 and 10 mM) and high intensity (92 dB SPL; 10 mM), increased N1 latency at high and low intensity (3 and 10 mM) and suppressed low intensity summating potential (SP; 10 mM) without an effect on high intensity SP. Ryanodine significantly suppressed the CAP at low intensity (100 and 333 microM) and at high intensity (333 microM), increased N1 latency at low intensity (33, 100 and 333 microM) and at high intensity (333 microM) and suppressed low intensity SP (100 and 333 microM) and increased high intensity SP (333 microM). The cochlear microphonic (CM) evoked by 10 kHz tone bursts was not affected by caffeine at high or low intensity, and ryanodine had no effect on it at low intensity but decreased it at high intensity (10, 33, 100 and 333 microM). In contrast, caffeine (10 mM) and ryanodine (33 and 100 microM) significantly increased CM evoked by l kHz tone bursts and recorded from the round window. Caffeine (10 mM) and ryanodine (100 microM) reversibly suppressed the cubic DPOAEs evoked by low intensity primaries. Overall, low intensity evoked responses were more sensitive and were suppressed to a greater extent by both drugs. This is consistent with the hypothesis that release of Ca(2+) from ryanodine receptor Ca(2+) stores, possibly in outer hair cells and supporting cells, affects the function of the cochlear amplifier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433408     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00654-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of hair cell efferents.

Authors:  Eric Wersinger; Paul Albert Fuchs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Cloning and characterization of SK2 channel from chicken short hair cells.

Authors:  T M Matthews; R K Duncan; M Zidanic; T H Michael; P A Fuchs
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Pharmacology of acetylcholine-mediated cell signaling in the lateral line organ following efferent stimulation.

Authors:  Rosie Dawkins; Sarah L Keller; William F Sewell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of developmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and/or polybrominated diphenyl ethers on cochlear function.

Authors:  Emily Poon; Brian E Powers; Ruth M McAlonan; Duncan C Ferguson; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Otoconin-90 deletion leads to imbalance but normal hearing: a comparison with other otoconia mutants.

Authors:  X Zhao; S M Jones; E N Yamoah; Y Wang Lundberg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Perilymph osmolality modulates cochlear function.

Authors:  Chul-Hee Choi; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  ATP-Evoked Intracellular Ca²⁺ Signaling of Different Supporting Cells in the Hearing Mouse Hemicochlea.

Authors:  T Horváth; G Polony; Á Fekete; M Aller; G Halmos; B Lendvai; A Heinrich; B Sperlágh; E S Vizi; T Zelles
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 8.  The role of caffeine in otorhinolaryngology: guilty as charged?

Authors:  A Trinidade; T Robinson; J S Phillips
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  The molecular architecture of ribbon presynaptic terminals.

Authors:  George Zanazzi; Gary Matthews
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.590

10.  Differential expression of ryanodine receptor in the developing rat cochlea.

Authors:  Y Liang; L Huang; J Yang
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.