Literature DB >> 12433121

The generalized equivalent uniform dose function as a basis for intensity-modulated treatment planning.

Beong Choi1, Joseph O Deasy.   

Abstract

The efficiency of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning depends critically on the presence or absence of multiple local minima in the feasible search space. We analyse the convexity of the generalized equivalent uniform dose equation (Niemierko A 1999 Med. Phys. 26 1100) when used either in the objective function or in the constraints. The practical importance of this analysis is that convex objective functions minimized over convex feasibility spaces do not have multiple local minima, likewise for concave objective functions maximized over convex feasibility spaces. Both of these situations are referred to as 'convex problems' and computationally efficient local search methods can be used for their solution. We also show that the Poisson-based tumour control probability objective function is strictly concave (if one neglects inter-patient heterogeneity), and hence it implies a single local minimum if maximized over a convex feasibility space. Even when including inter-patient heterogeneity, multiple local minima, although theoretically possible, are expected to be of minimal concern. The generalized equivalent uniform dose function (EUDa) is proved to be convex or concave depending on its only parameter a: when a is equal to or greater than 1, minimizing EUDa, on a convex feasibility space leads to a single minimum; when a is less than 1, maximizing EUDa, on a convex feasibility space leads to a single minimum. We also study a recently proposed practical, yet difficult, IMRT treatment planning formulation: unconstrained optimization of the objective function proposed by Wu et al (2002 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 52 224-35), which is expressed in terms of the EUDa for the target and normal tissues. This formulation may theoretically lead to multiple local minima. We propose a procedure for improving resulting solutions based on the convexity properties of the underlying objective function terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433121     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/20/302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis for lexicographic ordering in radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  T Long; M Matuszak; M Feng; B A Fraass; R K Ten Haken; H E Romeijn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluating target cold spots by the use of tail EUDs.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft; James F Dempsey; Tarek Halabi; H Edwin Romeijn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Imaging and dosimetric errors in 4D PET/CT-guided radiotherapy from patient-specific respiratory patterns: a dynamic motion phantom end-to-end study.

Authors:  S R Bowen; M J Nyflot; C Herrmann; C M Groh; J Meyer; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; P E Kinahan; G A Sandison
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Study of Asymmetric Margins in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Fuzzy Logic.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Patnaikuni; Sapan Mohan Saini; Rakesh Mohan Chandola; Pradeep Chandrakar; Vivek Chaudhary
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-20

5.  Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; John G Eley; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Simple carotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique and preliminary experience for T1-2 glottic cancer.

Authors:  David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Jerry L Barker; Bryan Mason; John A Garcia; Jan S Lewin; F Christopher Holsinger; C Richard Stasney; Steven J Frank; David L Schwartz; William H Morrison; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A novel metric for quantification of homogeneous and heterogeneous tumors in PET for enhanced clinical outcome prediction.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; C Ross Schmidtlein; Andrew Jackson; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Charles Marcus; Saeed Ashrafinia; Madjid Soltani; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  The benefit of using bladder sub-volume equivalent uniform dose constraints in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Antoine Simon; Pascal Haigron; Caroline Lafond; Oscar Acosta; Huazhong Shu; Joel Castelli; Baosheng Li; Renaud De Crevoisier
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Spatial and dosimetric evaluation of residual distortions of prostate and seminal vesicle bed after image-guided definitive and postoperative radiotherapy of prostate cancer with endorectal balloon.

Authors:  Sabine Levegrün; Christoph Pöttgen; Konstantinos Xydis; Maja Guberina; Jehad Abu Jawad; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Prescription Value-Based Automatic Optimization of Importance Factors in Inverse Planning.

Authors:  Caiping Guo; Pengcheng Zhang; Zhiguo Gui; Huazhong Shu; Lihong Zhai; Jinrong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.