Literature DB >> 12432517

Multitrophic interactions of the silverleaf whitefly, host plants, competing herbivores, and phytopathogens.

Richard T Mayer1, Moshe Inbar, C L McKenzie, Robert Shatters, Victoria Borowicz, Ute Albrecht, Charles A Powell, Hamed Doostdar.   

Abstract

Our laboratory found that silverleaf whitefly (SLW; Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring) feeding alters host plant physiology and chemistry. The SLW induces a number of host plant defenses, including pathogenesis-related (PR) protein accumulation (e.g., chitinases, beta-1,3-glucanases, peroxidases, chitosanases, etc.). Induction of the PR proteins by SLW feeding occurs in various plant species and varieties. The extent and type of induction is dependent on a number of factors that include host plant growing conditions, the length of time the host plant is exposed to SLW feeding, the plant variety, and SLW population densities. The appearance of PR proteins correlates well with reduced infestations of conspecific insect herbivore competitors. Greenhouse and field experiments in which herbivore competitors (cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni; leaf miner, Liromyza trifolii) were placed on plants previously exposed to SLW feeding demonstrated behavioral differences (oviposition, feeding preferences) and reduced survival rates and development times of these insects. The interaction was asymmetrical, i.e., SLW infestations of plants previously exposed to leaf miners had little or no effect on SLW behavior (oviposition). Induction of plant-defensive proteins by SLW feeding was both local (at the feeding site) and systemic (uninfested leaves distant to the feeding site). There are interactions between diseases such as tomato mottle virus (ToMoV; a geminivirus) and the host plant and SLW. PR proteins were induced in tomato plants infected with ToMoV much as they were via non-viruliferous SLW feeding. The presence of ToMoV in tomato plants significantly increased the number of eggs produced by SLW females. Experiments using tomato plants, powdery mildew (PM), and tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) show that whitefly infestations can affect plant pathogen relationships but the effects vary among pathogen types. Enzyme analyses prior to pathogen inoculation showed that whitefly treatment significantly increased the activities of foliar chitinase and peroxidase. Evaluation of pathogen growth 3 weeks after inoculation showed that whitefly feeding significantly reduced the incidence of PM. However, TMV levels evaluated by ELISA were not significantly affected by whitefly feeding. Six weeks after inoculation with pathogens, the chitinase and peroxidase activities were still elevated in plants initially fed on by whiteflies but continuing pathogen infection had no effect on these enzymes. The possibility that geminivirus infection and/or SLW infestations isolate the host plant for the selected reproduction of the virus and the insect is discussed. Multitrophic cascade effects may contribute to the successful eruptive appearance of SLW on various crops, ranking them as a major pest. They may explain the general observation that when SLW infest a host plant there are few if any competing insect herbivores and pathogens found in the host. However, the results indicate that certain SLW-virus relationships could be mutualistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12432517     DOI: 10.1002/arch.10065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol        ISSN: 0739-4462            Impact factor:   1.698


  26 in total

Review 1.  The virulence-transmission trade-off in vector-borne plant viruses: a review of (non-)existing studies.

Authors:  R Froissart; J Doumayrou; F Vuillaume; S Alizon; Y Michalakis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Virus strains differentially induce plant susceptibility to aphid vectors and chewing herbivores.

Authors:  Mônica F Kersch-Becker; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Intra-specific variation in wild Brassica oleracea for aphid-induced plant responses and consequences for caterpillar-parasitoid interactions.

Authors:  Yehua Li; Marcel Dicke; Jeffrey A Harvey; Rieta Gols
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A cry for help from leaf to root: above ground insect feeding leads to the recruitment of rhizosphere microbes for plant self-protection against subsequent diverse attacks.

Authors:  Hwe-Su Yi; Jung Wook Yang; Sa-Youl Ghim; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 5.  Phytohormone mediation of interactions between herbivores and plant pathogens.

Authors:  Jenny Lazebnik; Enric Frago; Marcel Dicke; Joop J A van Loon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Foliar aphid feeding recruits rhizosphere bacteria and primes plant immunity against pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in pepper.

Authors:  Boyoung Lee; Soohyun Lee; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Major signaling pathways modulate Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects.

Authors:  Inga Mewis; Heidi M Appel; Amanda Hom; Ramesh Raina; Jack C Schultz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Spatiotemporal patterns of induced resistance and susceptibility linking diverse plant parasites.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Mouttet; Ian Kaplan; Philippe Bearez; Edwige Amiens-Desneux; Nicolas Desneux
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Influence of a propagative plant virus on the fitness and wing dimorphism of infected and exposed insect vectors.

Authors:  Clesson H V Higashi; Alberto Bressan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Responses of Helicoverpa armigera to tomato plants previously infected by ToMV or damaged by H. armigera.

Authors:  Li Lin; Tse-Chi Shen; Yi-Hua Chen; Shaw-Yhi Hwang
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.