PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of aggressively treating patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer and a poor prognosis. METHODS: From 1988 to 1999, 64 patients with unresectable multiple liver metastases from colorectal cancer who had received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy were investigated. All patients did not have synchronous extrahepatic metastases at the time of initiating our treatment. When liver metastases were suitable for resection after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, we excised them and repeated prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as long as possible. We evaluated the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy by computed tomography and divided these patients into responders and nonresponders. We performed univariate analysis using the log-rank test to calculate predictive factors. In addition, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate analysis of factors related to survival. RESULTS: The survival rate of all patients was 67.8 percent after 1 year and 10 percent after 5 years. However, the survival rate for 16 patients who received hepatectomy after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was 35.1 percent after five years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the response after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was the most indicative prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of selected patients who responded to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and received hepatectomy was improved. Applying aggressive treatment as outlined in our strategy may improve the chances of long-term survival.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of aggressively treating patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer and a poor prognosis. METHODS: From 1988 to 1999, 64 patients with unresectable multiple liver metastases from colorectal cancer who had received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy were investigated. All patients did not have synchronous extrahepatic metastases at the time of initiating our treatment. When liver metastases were suitable for resection after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, we excised them and repeated prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as long as possible. We evaluated the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy by computed tomography and divided these patients into responders and nonresponders. We performed univariate analysis using the log-rank test to calculate predictive factors. In addition, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate analysis of factors related to survival. RESULTS: The survival rate of all patients was 67.8 percent after 1 year and 10 percent after 5 years. However, the survival rate for 16 patients who received hepatectomy after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was 35.1 percent after five years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the response after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was the most indicative prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of selected patients who responded to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and received hepatectomy was improved. Applying aggressive treatment as outlined in our strategy may improve the chances of long-term survival.