Literature DB >> 12431954

Mentorship through advisory colleges.

Andrew H Murr1, Carol Miller, Maxine Papadakis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical students face pressures ranging from the need to create a social network to learning vast amounts of scientific material. Students often feel isolated in this system and lack mentorship. In order to counteract feelings of bureaucratic anonymity and isolation, the University of California San Francisco has created an advisory college to foster the professional and personal growth and well being of students. DESCRIPTION: UCSF has developed a formal structure to advise medical students. A selection committee, chaired by the associate dean of student affairs, appointed five faculty mentors to head advisory colleges. These five colleges serve as the advising and well-being infrastructure for the students. Mentors were chosen from a balanced range of clinical disciplines, both primary and specialty. The disciplines are obstetrics-gynecology, otolaryngology/head and neck surgery, medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry. The mentors have demonstrated excellence in advising and counseling of students. Mentors meet individually at the beginning of the academic year with incoming first-year and second-year students. They then have bimonthly meetings with eight to ten students within each college throughout the academic year. Curricula for these group sessions include well-being discussions and coping techniques, sessions on the hidden and informal curriculum of professionalism, and discussions on career choices and strategies. For third-year students, advisory college meetings are scheduled during intersessions, which are weeklong courses that occur between the eight-week clerkship blocks. Mentors are available throughout the year to meet with students on an as-needed basis, and advisory colleges may hold group social activities. The dean's office supports each mentor with 20% salary and provides administrative support for the group college activities. DISCUSSION: Historically, UCSF students feel they receive an excellent education and appropriate job opportunities, but they do not feel they receive adequate advising and mentoring. This may have as its root cause the financial, clinical, and research pressures placed upon a faculty who are also responsible for mentoring residents and fellows. The advisory colleges begin by providing an infrastructure for developing a relationship for the student with a single faculty member. The advisory college system is incorporated into the academic schedule rather than relying on ad-hoc activities from well-meaning but inconsistently available faculty. In the early part of medical school, the advisory college relationship concentrates on assimilation into the new environment and provides the student with advice pertaining to mastering academic material. The college also serves as a sounding board for problems that can then be relayed to course directors to improve the educational experience. For students encountering academic difficulty, the college advisor can provide discreet advice about tutoring resources and can direct the student to a separately staffed Student Well-being Program. As time progresses, the mentors can direct students to key people in different fields of interest such as program directors and keep the students on track to make career decisions in a timely manner. The college system can help transform an anonymous medical school experience into a supportive, rich environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431954     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

1.  More mentoring needed? A cross-sectional study of mentoring programs for medical students in Germany.

Authors:  Felix G Meinel; Konstantinos Dimitriadis; Philip von der Borch; Sylvère Störmann; Sophie Niedermaier; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Mentorship of US Medical Students: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amy H Farkas; Jill Allenbaugh; Eliana Bonifacino; Rose Turner; Jennifer A Corbelli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Partnership for development: A peer mentorship model for PhD students.

Authors:  Allison A Lewinski; Tara Mann; Dalmacio Flores; Ashlee Vance; Janet Prvu Bettger; Rachel Hirschey
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  Mentoring programs for medical students--a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008.

Authors:  Esther Frei; Martina Stamm; Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Dual peer mentoring program for undergraduate medical students: exploring the perceptions of mentors and mentees.

Authors:  Parya Abdolalizadeh; Saeed Pourhassan; Roghayeh Gandomkar; Farrokh Heidari; Amir Ali Sohrabpour
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-01-11

6.  Perceptions of nephrology among medical students and internal medicine residents: a national survey among institutions with nephrology exposure.

Authors:  Devika Nair; Kurtis A Pivert; Adrian Baudy; Charuhas V Thakar
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Mentoring stages: A study of undergraduate mentoring in palliative medicine in Singapore.

Authors:  Lalit Krishna; Ying Pin Toh; Stephen Mason; Ravindran Kanesvaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An advisory program for first- and second-year medical students: the Weill Cornell experience.

Authors:  Lewis M Drusin; Linda M Gerber; Carlyle H Miller; Carol L Storey-Johnson; Bruce L Ballard
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-11-29

9.  Influence of clerks' personality on their burnout in the clinical workplace: a longitudinal observation.

Authors:  Cheng-Chieh Lin; Blossom Yen-Ju Lin; Chia-Der Lin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The Munich-Evaluation-of-Mentoring-Questionnaire (MEMeQ)--a novel instrument for evaluating protégés' satisfaction with mentoring relationships in medical education.

Authors:  Matthias Schäfer; Tanja Pander; Severin Pinilla; Martin R Fischer; Philip von der Borch; Konstantinos Dimitriadis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.