Literature DB >> 12431918

Should medical school faculty see assessments of students made by previous teachers?

Wayne L Gold1, Patricia McArdle, Daniel D Federman.   

Abstract

Whether medical school faculty should be provided with assessments of students made by previous teachers remains controversial. To document which schools have implemented policies that address this issue and to characterize the specific features of these policies, in 1998 the authors conducted a direct mail survey of deans of student affairs and medical education at 144 medical schools in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Replies were received from 129 (90%) of the 144 medical schools. Of those schools, 72 (56%) reported having policies that address this issue. The policies permit the sharing of information in 38 (53%) of the 72 schools that had policies; therefore, at the time of this study, 29% of the 129 medical schools that responded to the survey had a policy that permits the sharing of assessment information. The policies permit the sharing of information related to problems with academic performance (35%), professional conduct (35%), physical health (25%), and miscellaneous circumstances, such as learning disability (5%). Information may be shared with clerkship coordinators (44%), course directors (35%), faculty mentors (11%), clinical faculty supervisors (8%), and resident supervisors (3%). The findings show that there is considerable diversity in the format and content of policies that address the issue of whether medical school faculty should be provided with information about students' assessments made by previous teachers. The authors explain why policies that require the provision of such information are helpful to medical school faculty, and offer recommendations based on the survey findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431918     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  3 in total

1.  [Creation and implementation of a remediation tool in a family medicine residency program].

Authors:  Gilbert Sanche; Normand Béland; Marie-Claude Audétat
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Guidelines: The dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education.

Authors:  Calvin L Chou; Adina Kalet; Manuel Joao Costa; Jennifer Cleland; Kalman Winston
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

3.  Learner handover: Perspectives and recommendations from the front-line.

Authors:  Stephanie T Gumuchian; Nicole E Pal; Meredith Young; Deborah Danoff; Laurie H Plotnick; Beth-Ann Cummings; Carlos Gomez-Garibello; Valérie Dory
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.