Literature DB >> 12431422

Site-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate antagonists produce distinct effects in rats performing complex discriminations.

Catherine B Willmore1, Anton Y Bespalov, Patrick M Beardsley.   

Abstract

Glutamate receptor-dependent neural plasticity is thought to be implicated in memory processes. Ionotropic N-methyl-D-aspartate- (NMDA) sensitive and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate- (AMPA) sensitive glutamate receptors have been particularly studied for their role in synaptic plasticity. Drugs can alter AMPA and NMDA receptor neurotransmission by competing for the glutamate site or other sites on these receptor proteins. Variants of the protein subunits forming AMPA and NMDA heteromers contribute to the complexity of pharmacological activity at these receptors. The NMDA receptor has numerous modulatory centers, including the glycine binding site, NR2B protein specific binding site, and an intrachannel (PCP) binding site. In this study, the accuracy and rate of rats performing under a Fixed Consecutive Number (FCN) operant task were measured after administrations of site-selective AMPA and NMDA receptor modulators. Test compounds included two glycine site NMDA agonists [(+)HA 966 and D-cycloserine], two NR2-B site NMDA antagonists (eliprodil and ifenprodil), an NMDA channel blocking antagonist (MK 801), and a competitively acting AMPA receptor antagonist (NBQX). The accuracy of FCN performance was not affected by response-rate-altering doses of (+) HA 966, D-cycloserine, eliprodil, ifenprodil, or NBQX. MK 801, on the other hand, reduced performance accuracy at several doses. These results are consistent with earlier studies suggesting that AMPA antagonists minimally affect working memory and that glycine and NR2B protein-specific modulatory sites may have advantages as targets for the development of medications intended to alter NMDA receptor-mediated transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431422     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2002.4077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  3 in total

1.  Coantagonism of glutamate receptors and nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptors disrupts fear conditioning and latent inhibition of fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Cognitive effects of psychotomimetic drugs in rats discriminating number cues.

Authors:  C B Willmore; D M Krall; F M Spears; A Makriyannis; G I Elmer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  From muscle research to clinical applications: Do glutamate antagonists aid muscle recovery?

Authors:  Maria Albani; Athanasios Chatzisotiriou; Nikolaos Gougoulias
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-09-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.