Hazel Everitt1, Paul Little. 1. Community Clinical Sciences (CCS) Division, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences, Southampton University, UK. hae1@soton.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine GPs' diagnosis and management of acute infective conjunctivitis (AIC)-one of the commonest but least researched acute infections seen in primary care. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of 300 GPs from two Health Authorities in Southern England. RESULTS: 236 (78%) GPs returned the questionnaire. 92% of those responding felt confident or very confident in the diagnosis of AIC. 95% usually prescribe topical antibiotics for AIC despite 58% stating that they thought at least half of the cases they see are viral in origin and only 36% believing that they could discriminate between bacterial and viral infection. There was considerable variability in GPs' use of individual signs to make the diagnosis of AIC (from 99% using eye discharge to 31% using conjunctival oedema) and in the features used to discriminate viral from bacterial infection (from 87% using type of discharge to 47% using amount of discharge). GPs rarely perform eye swabs or give patient information leaflets to patients with AIC. CONCLUSION: Most GPs still prescribe topical antibiotics for most cases of AIC-a condition where only half of the cases are likely to be due to a bacterial infection, and even bacterial infections are self-limiting. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits and disadvantages of topical antibiotics, and to develop clinical or microbiological methods to help GPs to target antibiotic prescription.
OBJECTIVE: To determine GPs' diagnosis and management of acute infective conjunctivitis (AIC)-one of the commonest but least researched acute infections seen in primary care. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of 300 GPs from two Health Authorities in Southern England. RESULTS: 236 (78%) GPs returned the questionnaire. 92% of those responding felt confident or very confident in the diagnosis of AIC. 95% usually prescribe topical antibiotics for AIC despite 58% stating that they thought at least half of the cases they see are viral in origin and only 36% believing that they could discriminate between bacterial and viral infection. There was considerable variability in GPs' use of individual signs to make the diagnosis of AIC (from 99% using eye discharge to 31% using conjunctival oedema) and in the features used to discriminate viral from bacterial infection (from 87% using type of discharge to 47% using amount of discharge). GPs rarely perform eye swabs or give patient information leaflets to patients with AIC. CONCLUSION: Most GPs still prescribe topical antibiotics for most cases of AIC-a condition where only half of the cases are likely to be due to a bacterial infection, and even bacterial infections are self-limiting. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits and disadvantages of topical antibiotics, and to develop clinical or microbiological methods to help GPs to target antibiotic prescription.
Authors: Remco P Rietveld; Gerben ter Riet; Patrick J E Bindels; Dick Bink; Jacobus H Sloos; Henk C P M van Weert Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Joanna Jefferis; Rafael Perera; Hazel Everitt; Henk van Weert; Remco Rietveld; Paul Glasziou; Peter Rose Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 5.386