Literature DB >> 12428911

Houston Conference: need for more fundamental knowledge in neuropsychology.

Alfredo Ardila1.   

Abstract

Two training models in neuropsychology have been recently proposed (Guidelines of the INS-Division 40 Task Force on Education, Accreditation, and Credentialing, Clin. Neuropsychol. 1: 29-34, 1987; Hannay, H. J. et al., Anh. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13: 157-250,1998). When comparing both educational models, similarities but also differences are found. According to the Houston Conference model--but not to the former model--neuropsychology represents a specialty of psychology. In the Houston Conference training model, applied knowledge is overtly emphasized, whereas fundamental or basic knowledge in neuropsychology appears weak. The proposed program does not seem to provide sufficient emphasis and background knowledge in (1) History of neuropsychology, (2) Neuropsychological syndromes, and (3) Neuropsychology theory.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12428911     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020370728584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev        ISSN: 1040-7308            Impact factor:   7.444


  2 in total

1.  In response to the 1998 APA Division 40 Presidential Address: so where's the beef?

Authors:  G Rodriguez-Menendez
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Basic approaches used in American and Soviet clinical neuropsychology.

Authors:  A R Luria; L V Majovski
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1977-11
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  An essay on the Houston Conference policy statement: static yet incomplete or a work in progress?

Authors:  Cecil R Reynolds
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.444

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.