Literature DB >> 12428591

Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system.

Maria Cristina Borsatto1, Alma Blásida Elisaur Benitez Catirse, Regina Guenka Palma Dibb, Telma Nunes do Nascimento, Renata Andréa Salvitti de Sá Rocha, Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of a composite resin to dental enamel, using three different surface treatments. Fifteen sound third molars were randomly assigned to three groups. The mesial and distal surfaces were flattened and covered using adhesive tape with a central orifice delimiting the adhesion area (7.07 mm2). Group I, the enamel surface was conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s; group II, the surface was treated using air abrasion with aluminum oxide; group III, the enamel surface was treated using an association of air abrasion with aluminum oxide and 37% phosphoric acid. The Single Bond (3M) adhesive system was applied and a Teflon matrix was placed and filled with composite resin Z-100 (3M) and light-cured. The shear bond strength test was performed with a universal testing machine. The acid etching technique and air abrasion with aluminum oxide associated with acid etching had the highest shear bond strength values. Data were subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA and the Turkey test, and no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength was observed between group I (12.49 +/- 2.85 MPa) and group III (12.59 +/- 2.68 MPa). In contrast, both groups had statistically better shear bond strengths compared to group II (0.29 +/- 0.56 MPa; p < 0.05). Air abrasion with aluminum oxide does not substitute acid etching. The association of these methods to obtain adequate adhesion to the substrate is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12428591     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402002000300006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of surfaces and adhesive interfaces of enamel and dentin after different treatments.

Authors:  Michelle Alexandra Chinelatti; Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Lilian Faria Ribeiro; Renata Andréa Salvitti de Sá Rocha; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  A new dimension to conservative dentistry: Air abrasion.

Authors:  Vivek S Hegde; Roheet A Khatavkar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-01

3.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

4.  Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives.

Authors:  Claudio Poggio; Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo; Marco Chiesa; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-03-27

5.  Physicochemical Properties of Dentine Subjected to Microabrasive Blasting and Its Influence on Bonding to Self-Adhesive Prosthetic Cement in Shear Bond Strength Test: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Marcin Szerszeń; Julia Higuchi; Barbara Romelczyk-Baishya; Bartłomiej Górski; Witold Łojkowski; Zbigniew Pakieła; Elżbieta Mierzwińska-Nastalska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations.

Authors:  Naser Asl Aminabadi; Ebrahim Najafpour; Leila Erfanparast; Mohammad Samiei; Monireh Haghifar; Alireza Sighari Deljavan; Zahra Jamali; Fatemeh Pournaghi Azar; Marzieh Shokravi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2014-06-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.